mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Broader View on Bias in Automated Decision-Making: Reflecting on Epistemology and Dynamics

arXiv 1807.00553 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2018cs.LG cs.AI cs.SYcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) is increasingly deployed in real world contexts, supplying actionable insights and forming the basis of automated decision-making systems. While issues resulting from biases pre-existing in training data have been at the center of the fairness debate, these systems are also affected by technical and emergent biases, which often arise as context-specific artifacts of implementation. This position paper interprets technical bias as an epistemological problem and emergent bias as a dynamical feedback phenomenon. In order to stimulate debate on how to change machine learning practice to effectively address these issues, we explore this broader view on bias, stress the need to reflect on epistemology, and point to value-sensitive design methodologies to revisit the design and implementation process of automated decision-making systems.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

10 papers.