Rate-matching the regret lower-bound in the linear quadratic regulator with unknown dynamics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The theory of reinforcement learning currently suffers from a mismatch between its empirical performance and the theoretical characterization of its performance, with consequences for, e.g., the understanding of sample efficiency, safety, and robustness. The linear quadratic regulator with unknown dynamics is a fundamental reinforcement learning setting with significant structure in its dynamics and cost function, yet even in this setting there is a gap between the best known regret lower-bound of Omegap(√T) and the best known upper-bound of Op(√T,polylog(T)). The contribution of this paper is to close that gap by establishing a novel regret upper-bound of Op(√T). Our proof is constructive in that it analyzes the regret of a concrete algorithm, and simultaneously establishes an estimation error bound on the dynamics of Op(T-1/4) which is also the first to match the rate of a known lower-bound. The two keys to our improved proof technique are (1) a more precise upper- and lower-bound on the system Gram matrix and (2) a self-bounding argument for the expected estimation error of the optimal controller.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2022.
Builds on
29 of 53 references.
References · 29
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
- 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
- 2018Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 211
- 2018Learning Without Mixing: Towards A Sharp Analysis of Linear System Identificationcited by 158
- 2018A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Controlcited by 129
- 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 111
- 2019Non-Asymptotic Gap-Dependent Regret Bounds for Tabular MDPscited by 104
- 2020Information Theoretic Regret Bounds for Online Nonlinear Controlcited by 87
- 2018Regret Bounds for Robust Adaptive Control of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 86
- 2019Learning Linear-Quadratic Regulators Efficiently with only √T Regretcited by 67
17 more
- 2014Lipschitz Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 59
- 2019Nearly Minimax-Optimal Regret for Linearly Parameterized Banditscited by 54
- 2015Regret Lower Bound and Optimal Algorithm in Dueling Bandit Problemcited by 51
- 2021Fine-Grained Gap-Dependent Bounds for Tabular MDPs via Adaptive Multi-Step Bootstrapcited by 48
- 2020Logarithmic Regret for Adversarial Online Controlcited by 41
- 2016On Lower Bounds for Regret in Reinforcement Learningcited by 39
- 2018Exploration in Structured Reinforcement Learningcited by 34
- 2020Logarithmic Regret for Learning Linear Quadratic Regulators Efficientlycited by 33
- 2017Posterior sampling for reinforcement learning: worst-case regret boundscited by 28
- 2018KL-UCB-switch: optimal regret bounds for stochastic bandits from both a distribution-dependent and a distribution-free viewpointscited by 20
- 2021A Fully Problem-Dependent Regret Lower Bound for Finite-Horizon MDPscited by 15
- 2013Efficient Reinforcement Learning for High Dimensional Linear Quadratic Systemscited by 13
- 2021Minimal Expected Regret in Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 13
- 2017Learning-based Control of Unknown Linear Systems with Thompson Samplingcited by 10
- 2021Safe Adaptive Learning-based Control for Constrained Linear Quadratic Regulators with Regret Guaranteescited by 10
- 2021Dynamic Regret Minimization for Control of Non-stationary Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 4
- 2020Exact Asymptotics for Linear Quadratic Adaptive Controlcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.