mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

KL-UCB-switch: optimal regret bounds for stochastic bandits from both a distribution-dependent and a distribution-free viewpoints

arXiv 1805.05071 ↗First posted 14 May 2018stat.ML cs.LG math.STcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider K-armed stochastic bandits and consider cumulative regret bounds up to time T. We are interested in strategies achieving simultaneously a distribution-free regret bound of optimal order √KT and a distribution-dependent regret that is asymptotically optimal, that is, matching the kappaln T lower bound by Lai and Robbins (1985) and Burnetas and Katehakis (1996), where kappa is the optimal problem-dependent constant. This constant kappa depends on the model D considered (the family of possible distributions over the arms). M'enard and Garivier (2017) provided strategies achieving such a bi-optimality in the parametric case of models given by one-dimensional exponential families, while Lattimore (2016, 2018) did so for the family of (sub)Gaussian distributions with variance less than 1. We extend this result to the non-parametric case of all distributions over [0,1]. We do so by combining the MOSS strategy by Audibert and Bubeck (2009), which enjoys a distribution-free regret bound of optimal order √KT, and the KL-UCB strategy by Capp'e et al. (2013), for which we provide in passing the first analysis of an optimal distribution-dependent kappaln T regret bound in the model of all distributions over [0,1]. We were able to obtain this non-parametric bi-optimality result while working hard to streamline the proofs (of previously known regret bounds and thus of the new analyses carried out); a second merit of the present contribution is therefore to provide a review of proofs of classical regret bounds for index-based strategies for K-armed stochastic bandits.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 May 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 6; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Top Two Algorithms Revisitedcited by 34
  2. 2022From Dirichlet to Rubin: Optimistic Exploration in RL without Bonusescited by 22
  3. 2024UCB algorithms for multi-armed bandits: Precise regret and adaptive inferencecited by 16
  4. 2022Optimistic Posterior Sampling for Reinforcement Learning with Few Samples and Tight Guaranteescited by 12
  5. 2022Finite-Time Regret of Thompson Sampling Algorithms for Exponential Family Multi-Armed Banditscited by 11
  6. 2022On Best-Arm Identification with a Fixed Budget in Non-Parametric Multi-Armed Banditscited by 8
  7. 2025Strategic Scaling of Test-Time Compute: A Bandit Learning Approachcited by 8
  8. 2021A Non-asymptotic Approach to Best-Arm Identification for Gaussian Banditscited by 7
  9. 2021Finite-time Analysis of Globally Nonstationary Multi-Armed Banditscited by 7
  10. 2023Sharp Deviations Bounds for Dirichlet Weighted Sums with Application to analysis of Bayesian algorithmscited by 2
  11. 2023Kullback-Leibler Maillard Sampling for Multi-armed Bandits with Bounded Rewardscited by 2
  12. 2026Bandit Allocational Instabilitycited by 2
8 more
  1. 2021Query-Reward Tradeoffs in Multi-Armed Banditscited by 1
  2. 2024On Lai's Upper Confidence Bound in Multi-Armed Banditscited by 1
  3. 2022Rate-matching the regret lower-bound in the linear quadratic regulator with unknown dynamicscited by 0
  4. 2023Little Exploration is All You Needcited by 0
  5. 2024HELLINGER-UCB: A novel algorithm for stochastic multi-armed bandit problem and cold start problem in recommender systemcited by 0
  6. 2024Narrowing the Gap between Adversarial and Stochastic MDPs via Policy Optimizationcited by 0
  7. 2025Sharper Perturbed-Kullback-Leibler Exponential Tail Bounds for Beta and Dirichlet Distributionscited by 0
  8. 2026Multi-Armed Bernoulli Bandits via Minimax Single-Arm Stoppingcited by 0