mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dynamic Regret Minimization for Control of Non-stationary Linear Dynamical Systems

arXiv 2111.03772 ↗First posted 6 Nov 2021cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of controlling a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) system over a finite horizon T with fixed and known cost matrices Q,R, but unknown and non-stationary dynamics At, Bt. The sequence of dynamics matrices can be arbitrary, but with a total variation, VT, assumed to be o(T) and unknown to the controller. Under the assumption that a sequence of stabilizing, but potentially sub-optimal controllers is available for all t, we present an algorithm that achieves the optimal dynamic regret of tildeOleft(VT2/5T3/5right). With piece-wise constant dynamics, our algorithm achieves the optimal regret of tildeO(√ST) where S is the number of switches. The crux of our algorithm is an adaptive non-stationarity detection strategy, which builds on an approach recently developed for contextual Multi-armed Bandit problems. We also argue that non-adaptive forgetting (e.g., restarting or using sliding window learning with a static window size) may not be regret optimal for the LQR problem, even when the window size is optimally tuned with the knowledge of VT. The main technical challenge in the analysis of our algorithm is to prove that the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator has a small bias when the parameter to be estimated is non-stationary. Our analysis also highlights that the key motif driving the regret is that the LQR problem is in spirit a bandit problem with linear feedback and locally quadratic cost. This motif is more universal than the LQR problem itself, and therefore we believe our results should find wider application.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2021.

Builds on

16 of 39 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 875
  2. 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 116
  3. 2021Non-stationary Reinforcement Learning without Prior Knowledge: An Optimal Black-box Approachcited by 98
  4. 2018Regret Bounds for Robust Adaptive Control of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 86
  5. 2019Weighted Linear Bandits for Non-Stationary Environmentscited by 86
  6. 2018Learning to Optimize under Non-Stationaritycited by 85
  7. 2020Improper Learning for Non-Stochastic Controlcited by 83
  8. 2018Online Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 56
  9. 2019The Nonstochastic Control Problemcited by 52
  10. 2020Logarithmic Regret for Learning Linear Quadratic Regulators Efficientlycited by 35
  11. 2019Variational Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
  12. 2018A Sliding-Window Algorithm for Markov Decision Processes with Arbitrarily Changing Rewards and Transitionscited by 30
4 more
  1. 2020Regret Bounds for Adaptive Nonlinear Controlcited by 25
  2. 2018Input Perturbations for Adaptive Control and Learningcited by 18
  3. 2021Minimal Expected Regret in Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 13
  4. 2020Regret-optimal control in dynamic environmentscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

4 papers.