Solving Dynamic Principal-Agent Problems with a Rationally Inattentive Principal
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Principal-Agent (PA) problems describe a broad class of economic relationships characterized by misaligned incentives and asymmetric information. The Principal's problem is to find optimal incentives given the available information, e.g., a manager setting optimal wages for its employees. Whereas the Principal is often assumed rational, comparatively little is known about solutions when the Principal is boundedly rational, especially in the sequential setting, with multiple Agents, and with multiple information channels. Here, we develop RIRL, a deep reinforcement learning framework that solves such complex PA problems with a rationally inattentive Principal. Such a Principal incurs a cost for paying attention to information, which can model forms of bounded rationality. We use RIRL to analyze rich economic phenomena in manager-employee relationships. In the single-step setting, 1) RIRL yields wages that are consistent with theoretical predictions; and 2) non-zero attention costs lead to simpler but less profitable wage structures, and increased Agent welfare. In a sequential setting with multiple Agents, RIRL shows opposing consequences of the Principal's inattention to different information channels: 1) inattention to Agents' outputs closes wage gaps based on ability differences; and 2) inattention to Agents' efforts induces a social dilemma dynamic in which Agents work harder, but essentially for free. Moreover, RIRL reveals non-trivial relationships between the Principal's inattention and Agent types, e.g., if Agents are prone to sub-optimal effort choices, payment schedules are more sensitive to the Principal's attention cost. As such, RIRL can reveal novel economic relationships and enables progress towards understanding the effects of bounded rationality in dynamic settings.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2022.
Builds on
23 of 63 references.
References · 23
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 734
- 2019Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurriculacited by 308
- 2016Variational Intrinsic Controlcited by 262
- 2017Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmascited by 206
- 2015Variational Information Maximisation for Intrinsically Motivated Reinforcement Learningcited by 142
- 2020Explore, Discover and Learn: Unsupervised Discovery of State-Covering Skillscited by 120
- 2019Brain-Like Object Recognition with High-Performing Shallow Recurrent ANNscited by 90
- 2020The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax Policiescited by 75
- 2019Feudal Multi-Agent Hierarchies for Cooperative Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
- 2019Modelling Bounded Rationality in Multi-Agent Interactions by Generalized Recursive Reasoningcited by 24
- 2019Cognitive Model Priors for Predicting Human Decisionscited by 24
11 more
- 2018M3RL: Mind-aware Multi-agent Management Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
- 2021Building a Foundation for Data-Driven, Interpretable, and Robust Policy Design using the AI Economistcited by 22
- 2015Information-Theoretic Bounded Rationalitycited by 21
- 2019Mutual-Information Regularization in Markov Decision Processes and Actor-Critic Learningcited by 18
- 2021The AI Economist: Optimal Economic Policy Design via Two-level Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
- 2020A neural network walks into a lab: towards using deep nets as models for human behaviorcited by 10
- 2019Rationally Inattentive Inverse Reinforcement Learning Explains YouTube Commenting Behaviorcited by 6
- 2019Neural Networks for Predicting Human Interactions in Repeated Gamescited by 4
- 2017Modeling Human Categorization of Natural Images Using Deep Feature Representationscited by 2
- 2018An information-theoretic on-line update principle for perception-action couplingcited by 2
- 2021Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: The Quantal Hierarchy model of decision-makingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.