mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mutual-Information Regularization in Markov Decision Processes and Actor-Critic Learning

arXiv 1909.05950 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2019cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cumulative entropy regularization introduces a regulatory signal to the reinforcement learning (RL) problem that encourages policies with high-entropy actions, which is equivalent to enforcing small deviations from a uniform reference marginal policy. This has been shown to improve exploration and robustness, and it tackles the value overestimation problem. It also leads to a significant performance increase in tabular and high-dimensional settings, as demonstrated via algorithms such as soft Q-learning (SQL) and soft actor-critic (SAC). Cumulative entropy regularization has been extended to optimize over the reference marginal policy instead of keeping it fixed, yielding a regularization that minimizes the mutual information between states and actions. While this has been initially proposed for Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) in tabular settings, it was recently shown that a similar principle leads to significant improvements over vanilla SQL in RL for high-dimensional domains with discrete actions and function approximators. Here, we follow the motivation of mutual-information regularization from an inference perspective and theoretically analyze the corresponding Bellman operator. Inspired by this Bellman operator, we devise a novel mutual-information regularized actor-critic learning (MIRACLE) algorithm for continuous action spaces that optimizes over the reference marginal policy. We empirically validate MIRACLE in the Mujoco robotics simulator, where we demonstrate that it can compete with contemporary RL methods. Most notably, it can improve over the model-free state-of-the-art SAC algorithm which implicitly assumes a fixed reference policy.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Reinforcement Learning with Simple Sequence Priorscited by 11
  2. 2022Hierarchically Structured Task-Agnostic Continual Learningcited by 9
  3. 2021Mixture-of-Variational-Experts for Continual Learningcited by 7
  4. 2021Bellman: A Toolbox for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning in TensorFlowcited by 2
  5. 2022Planning Not to Talk: Multiagent Systems that are Robust to Communication Losscited by 2
  6. 2022Solving Dynamic Principal-Agent Problems with a Rationally Inattentive Principalcited by 2
  7. 2025Mutual Information Optimal Control of Discrete-Time Linear Systemscited by 2
  8. 2026Temporal Difference Learning with Constrained Initial Representationscited by 2
  9. 2021A space of goals: the cognitive geometry of informationally bounded agentscited by 1
  10. 2022Variational Inference for Model-Free and Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  11. 2025On Policy Stochasticity in Mutual Information Optimal Control of Linear Systemscited by 1
  12. 2026Behavior-Consistent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
6 more
  1. 2023Mitigating Estimation Errors by Twin TD-Regularized Actor and Critic for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  2. 2025Trajectory Entropy Reinforcement Learning for Robust Robot Motor Skill Learningcited by 0
  3. 2025Maximum Total Correlation Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  4. 2025Illuminating the Three Dogmas of Reinforcement Learning under Evolutionary Lightcited by 0
  5. 2026Mutual Information Optimal Density Control of Linear Systems and Generalized Schr"odinger Bridges with Reference Refinementcited by 0
  6. 2026Policy Complexity, Reaction Time, and Bounded Rationality in Reinforcement Learningcited by 0