Tight Convergence Rate Bounds for Optimization Under Power Law Spectral Conditions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Performance of optimization on quadratic problems sensitively depends on the low-lying part of the spectrum. For large (effectively infinite-dimensional) problems, this part of the spectrum can often be naturally represented or approximated by power law distributions, resulting in power law convergence rates for iterative solutions of these problems by gradient-based algorithms. In this paper, we propose a new spectral condition providing tighter upper bounds for problems with power law optimization trajectories. We use this condition to build a complete picture of upper and lower bounds for a wide range of optimization algorithms -- Gradient Descent, Steepest Descent, Heavy Ball, and Conjugate Gradients -- with an emphasis on the underlying schedules of learning rate and momentum. In particular, we demonstrate how an optimally accelerated method, its schedule, and convergence upper bound can be obtained in a unified manner for a given shape of the spectrum. Also, we provide first proofs of tight lower bounds for convergence rates of Steepest Descent and Conjugate Gradients under spectral power laws with general exponents. Our experiments show that the obtained convergence bounds and acceleration strategies are not only relevant for exactly quadratic optimization problems, but also fairly accurate when applied to the training of neural networks.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2022.
Builds on
19 of 62 references.
References · 19
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 353
- 2020Spectral Bias and Task-Model Alignment Explain Generalization in Kernel Regression and Infinitely Wide Neural Networkscited by 166
- 2020Finite Versus Infinite Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 156
- 2020Frequency Bias in Neural Networks for Input of Non-Uniform Densitycited by 140
- 2021Neural Networks as Kernel Learners: The Silent Alignment Effectcited by 106
- 2021Generalization Error Rates in Kernel Regression: The Crossover from the Noiseless to Noisy Regimecited by 95
- 2021Benign Overfitting of Constant-Stepsize SGD for Linear Regressioncited by 71
- 2021Last iterate convergence of SGD for Least-Squares in the Interpolation regimecited by 41
7 more
- 2020Tight Nonparametric Convergence Rates for Stochastic Gradient Descent under the Noiseless Linear Modelcited by 39
- 2020Optimal Rates for Averaged Stochastic Gradient Descent under Neural Tangent Kernel Regimecited by 35
- 2021Approximation and Learning with Deep Convolutional Models: a Kernel Perspectivecited by 31
- 2015From Averaging to Acceleration, There is Only a Step-sizecited by 24
- 2021Learning curves for Gaussian process regression with power-law priors and targetscited by 14
- 2019Training Neural Networks as Learning Data-adaptive Kernels: Provable Representation and Approximation Benefitscited by 13
- 2020Optimal Randomized First-Order Methods for Least-Squares Problemscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2025Scaling Laws for Gradient Descent and Sign Descent for Linear Bigram Models under Zipf's Lawcited by 19
- 2022A view of mini-batch SGD via generating functions: conditions of convergence, phase transitions, benefit from negative momentacited by 11
- 2025Models of Heavy-Tailed Mechanistic Universalitycited by 9
- 2022Approximation results for Gradient Descent trained Shallow Neural Networks in 1dcited by 7
- 2024Near-Interpolators: Rapid Norm Growth and the Trade-Off between Interpolation and Generalizationcited by 7
- 2023Approximation Results for Gradient Descent trained Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2024SGD with memory: fundamental properties and stochastic accelerationcited by 2
- 2025On the Effectiveness of the z-Transform Method in Quadratic Optimizationcited by 2
- 2026Balancing Early Performance Sacrifices with Long-Term Gains: Scaling Learning-Rate Warmup Duration Across Training Horizonscited by 0
- 2026Balancing Early Performance Sacrifices with Long-Term Gains: Scaling Learning-Rate Warmup Duration Across Training Horizons27 Sep 2026
- 2025On the Effectiveness of the z-Transform Method in Quadratic Optimization4 Jul 2025
- 2025Models of Heavy-Tailed Mechanistic Universality4 Jun 2025
- 2025Scaling Laws for Gradient Descent and Sign Descent for Linear Bigram Models under Zipf's Law25 May 2025
- 2024SGD with memory: fundamental properties and stochastic acceleration5 Oct 2024
- 2024Near-Interpolators: Rapid Norm Growth and the Trade-Off between Interpolation and Generalization12 Mar 2024
- 2023Approximation Results for Gradient Descent trained Neural Networks9 Sep 2023
- 2022Approximation results for Gradient Descent trained Shallow Neural Networks in 1d17 Sep 2022
- 2022A view of mini-batch SGD via generating functions: conditions of convergence, phase transitions, benefit from negative momenta22 Jun 2022