Models of Heavy-Tailed Mechanistic Universality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent theoretical and empirical successes in deep learning, including the celebrated neural scaling laws, are punctuated by the observation that many objects of interest tend to exhibit some form of heavy-tailed or power law behavior. In particular, the prevalence of heavy-tailed spectral densities in Jacobians, Hessians, and weight matrices has led to the introduction of the concept of heavy-tailed mechanistic universality (HT-MU). Multiple lines of empirical evidence suggest a robust correlation between heavy-tailed metrics and model performance, indicating that HT-MU may be a fundamental aspect of deep learning efficacy. Here, we propose a general family of random matrix models -- the high-temperature Marchenko-Pastur (HTMP) ensemble -- to explore attributes that give rise to heavy-tailed behavior in trained neural networks. Under this model, spectral densities with power laws on (upper and lower) tails arise through a combination of three independent factors (complex correlation structures in the data; reduced temperatures during training; and reduced eigenvector entropy), appearing as an implicit bias in the model structure, and they can be controlled with an "eigenvalue repulsion" parameter. Implications of our model on other appearances of heavy tails, including neural scaling laws, optimizer trajectories, and the five-plus-one phases of neural network training, are discussed.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 73 of its 129 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.
Builds on
73 of 129 references.
References · 73
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 776
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
- 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
38 more
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2019Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Themcited by 507
- 2021Deep Long-Tailed Learning: A Surveycited by 416
- 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 413
- 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
- 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 391
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 353
- 2021Deep learning: a statistical viewpointcited by 239
- 2019Generalization Bounds of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Wide and Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
- 2019A Tail-Index Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Noise in Deep Neural Networkscited by 213
- 2018Implicit Self-Regularization in Deep Neural Networks: Evidence from Random Matrix Theory and Implications for Learningcited by 211
- 2020Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 185
- 2017Theoretical insights into the optimization landscape of over-parameterized shallow neural networkscited by 128
- 2020The Heavy-Tail Phenomenon in SGDcited by 122
- 2020Predicting trends in the quality of state-of-the-art neural networks without access to training or testing datacited by 113
- 2019Dynamics of stochastic gradient descent for two-layer neural networks in the teacher-student setupcited by 112
- 2017Stochastic gradient descent performs variational inference, converges to limit cycles for deep networkscited by 108
- 2024A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 105
- 2019Traditional and Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization in Neural Network Modelscited by 104
- 2022A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 101
- 2019Dynamics of Deep Neural Networks and Neural Tangent Hierarchycited by 96
- 2016PAC-Bayesian Theory Meets Bayesian Inferencecited by 87
- 2022More Than a Toy: Random Matrix Models Predict How Real-World Neural Representations Generalizecited by 87
- 2022PAC-Bayes Compression Bounds So Tight That They Can Explain Generalizationcited by 75
- 2020Statistical Mechanics of Deep Linear Neural Networks: The Back-Propagating Kernel Renormalizationcited by 71
- 2018Statistical Optimality of Stochastic Gradient Descent on Hard Learning Problems through Multiple Passescited by 69
- 2020A Random Matrix Analysis of Random Fourier Features: Beyond the Gaussian Kernel, a Precise Phase Transition, and the Corresponding Double Descentcited by 69
- 20244+3 Phases of Compute-Optimal Neural Scaling Lawscited by 66
- 2018A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalizationcited by 65
- 2018The jamming transition as a paradigm to understand the loss landscape of deep neural networkscited by 61
- 2016A Variational Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Algorithmscited by 56
- 2024How Feature Learning Can Improve Neural Scaling Lawscited by 55
- 2025Deep Learning is Not So Mysterious or Differentcited by 55
- 2024Scaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and Datacited by 54
- 2018Products of Many Large Random Matrices and Gradients in Deep Neural Networkscited by 49
- 2019Heavy-Tailed Universality Predicts Trends in Test Accuracies for Very Large Pre-Trained Deep Neural Networkscited by 43
- 2019First Exit Time Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Descent Under Heavy-Tailed Gradient Noisecited by 43
- 2024AlphaPruning: Using Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization Theory for Improved Layer-wise Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 35
50 most cited of 73 All 73 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 7.
9 papers.
- 2025Scaling Laws and Spectra of Shallow Neural Networks in the Feature Learning Regimecited by 18
- 2026HTMuon: Improving Muon via Heavy-Tailed Spectral Correctioncited by 11
- 2026PRISM: Distribution-free Adaptive Computation of Matrix Functions for Accelerating Neural Network Trainingcited by 4
- 2026AlphaQ: Calibration-Free Bit Allocation for Mixture-of-Experts Quantizationcited by 4
- 2026Depth, Not Data: An Analysis of Hessian Spectral Bifurcationcited by 1
- 2026Is the Last Layer Sufficient for Uncertainty Quantification?cited by 1
- 2025Trustworthy Efficient Communication for Distributed Learning using LQ-SGD Algorithmcited by 0
- 2026Spectral Signatures of Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Eigenanalysis framework for autoregressive neural emulators of multi-scale chaotic dynamicscited by 0
- 2026Eigenanalysis framework for autoregressive neural emulators of multi-scale chaotic dynamics17 Aug 2026
- 2026Spectral Signatures of Large Language Models3 Jul 2026
- 2026AlphaQ: Calibration-Free Bit Allocation for Mixture-of-Experts Quantization3 Jun 2026
- 2026Is the Last Layer Sufficient for Uncertainty Quantification?29 May 2026
- 2026HTMuon: Improving Muon via Heavy-Tailed Spectral Correction10 Mar 2026
- 2026Depth, Not Data: An Analysis of Hessian Spectral Bifurcation31 Jan 2026
- 2026PRISM: Distribution-free Adaptive Computation of Matrix Functions for Accelerating Neural Network Training29 Jan 2026
- 2025Scaling Laws and Spectra of Shallow Neural Networks in the Feature Learning Regime29 Sep 2025
- 2025Trustworthy Efficient Communication for Distributed Learning using LQ-SGD Algorithm22 Jun 2025