Near-Interpolators: Rapid Norm Growth and the Trade-Off between Interpolation and Generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the generalization capability of nearly-interpolating linear regressors: boldsymbolβ's whose training error τ is positive but small, i.e., below the noise floor. Under a random matrix theoretic assumption on the data distribution and an eigendecay assumption on the data covariance matrix boldsymbolSigma, we demonstrate that any near-interpolator exhibits rapid norm growth: for τ fixed, boldsymbolβ has squared ℓ2-norm mathbbE[|boldsymbolβ|22] = Omega(nα) where n is the number of samples and α >1 is the exponent of the eigendecay, i.e., λi(boldsymbolSigma) ~ i-α. This implies that existing data-independent norm-based bounds are necessarily loose. On the other hand, in the same regime we precisely characterize the asymptotic trade-off between interpolation and generalization. Our characterization reveals that larger norm scaling exponents α correspond to worse trade-offs between interpolation and generalization. We verify empirically that a similar phenomenon holds for nearly-interpolating shallow neural networks.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2024.
Builds on
34 of 63 references.
References · 34
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 353
- 2020Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural Networkscited by 200
- 2018Just Interpolate: Kernel "Ridgeless" Regression Can Generalizecited by 190
- 2018To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learningcited by 186
- 2020Spectral Bias and Task-Model Alignment Explain Generalization in Kernel Regression and Infinitely Wide Neural Networkscited by 166
- 2020Benign overfitting in ridge regressioncited by 152
- 2021A Universal Law of Robustness via Isoperimetrycited by 150
- 2015High-Dimensional Asymptotics of Prediction: Ridge Regression and Classificationcited by 146
- 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 107
22 more
- 2019Traditional and Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization in Neural Network Modelscited by 104
- 2020On the Optimal Weighted ℓ2 Regularization in Overparameterized Linear Regressioncited by 97
- 2021Generalization Error Rates in Kernel Regression: The Crossover from the Noiseless to Noisy Regimecited by 95
- 2019Harnessing the Power of Infinitely Wide Deep Nets on Small-data Taskscited by 87
- 2022More Than a Toy: Random Matrix Models Predict How Real-World Neural Representations Generalizecited by 87
- 2020Implicit Regularization of Random Feature Modelscited by 54
- 2020Kernel Alignment Risk Estimator: Risk Prediction from Training Datacited by 54
- 2021Uniform Convergence of Interpolators: Gaussian Width, Norm Bounds, and Benign Overfittingcited by 54
- 2022Dimension free ridge regressioncited by 50
- 2020Tight Nonparametric Convergence Rates for Stochastic Gradient Descent under the Noiseless Linear Modelcited by 39
- 2019Exact expressions for double descent and implicit regularization via surrogate random designcited by 35
- 2021Early-stopped neural networks are consistentcited by 34
- 2021SGD in the Large: Average-case Analysis, Asymptotics, and Stepsize Criticalitycited by 33
- 2022Spectral Evolution and Invariance in Linear-width Neural Networkscited by 30
- 2021The Eigenlearning Framework: A Conservation Law Perspective on Kernel Regression and Wide Neural Networkscited by 25
- 2022Characterizing the Spectrum of the NTK via a Power Series Expansioncited by 22
- 2020Halting Time is Predictable for Large Models: A Universality Property and Average-case Analysiscited by 14
- 2022Tight Convergence Rate Bounds for Optimization Under Power Law Spectral Conditionscited by 9
- 2022A Universal Trade-off Between the Model Size, Test Loss, and Training Loss of Linear Predictorscited by 7
- 2017Eigenvalue Decay Implies Polynomial-Time Learnability for Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2022Learning Lipschitz Functions by GD-trained Shallow Overparameterized ReLU Neural Networkscited by 5
- 2023Least Squares Regression Can Exhibit Under-Parameterized Double Descentcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024Model Balancing Helps Low-data Training and Fine-tuningcited by 11
- 2024On Regularization via Early Stopping for Least Squares Regressioncited by 10
- 2025Low Rank Gradients and Where to Find Themcited by 4
- 2024Generalization for Least Squares Regression With Simple Spiked Covariancescited by 2
- 2024Error dynamics of mini-batch gradient descent with random reshuffling for least squares regressioncited by 0
- 2025A Ridge Too Far: Correcting Over-Shrinkage via Negative Regularizationcited by 0
- 2025Matricial Free Energy as a Gaussianizing Regularizer: Enhancing Autoencoders for Gaussian Code Generationcited by 0
- 2025Matricial Free Energy as a Gaussianizing Regularizer: Enhancing Autoencoders for Gaussian Code Generation20 Oct 2025
- 2025Low Rank Gradients and Where to Find Them1 Oct 2025
- 2025A Ridge Too Far: Correcting Over-Shrinkage via Negative Regularization24 Aug 2025
- 2024Generalization for Least Squares Regression With Simple Spiked Covariances17 Oct 2024
- 2024Model Balancing Helps Low-data Training and Fine-tuning16 Oct 2024
- 2024On Regularization via Early Stopping for Least Squares Regression6 Jun 2024
- 2024Error dynamics of mini-batch gradient descent with random reshuffling for least squares regression6 Jun 2024