Recursive Decoding: A Situated Cognition Approach to Compositional Generation in Grounded Language Understanding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Compositional generalization is a troubling blind spot for neural language models. Recent efforts have presented techniques for improving a model's ability to encode novel combinations of known inputs, but less work has focused on generating novel combinations of known outputs. Here we focus on this latter "decode-side" form of generalization in the context of gSCAN, a synthetic benchmark for compositional generalization in grounded language understanding. We present Recursive Decoding (RD), a novel procedure for training and using seq2seq models, targeted towards decode-side generalization. Rather than generating an entire output sequence in one pass, models are trained to predict one token at a time. Inputs (i.e., the external gSCAN environment) are then incrementally updated based on predicted tokens, and re-encoded for the next decoder time step. RD thus decomposes a complex, out-of-distribution sequence generation task into a series of incremental predictions that each resemble what the model has already seen during training. RD yields dramatic improvement on two previously neglected generalization tasks in gSCAN. We provide analyses to elucidate these gains over failure of a baseline, and then discuss implications for generalization in naturalistic grounded language understanding, and seq2seq more generally.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2022.
Builds on
22 of 34 references.
References · 22
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
- 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,013
- 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 773
- 2019Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?cited by 264
- 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 260
- 2019Self-Monitoring Navigation Agent via Auxiliary Progress Estimationcited by 173
- 2020Answering Complex Open-Domain Questions with Multi-Hop Dense Retrievalcited by 160
- 2019Good-Enough Compositional Data Augmentationcited by 158
- 2020A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understandingcited by 108
- 2019Compositional generalization through meta sequence-to-sequence learningcited by 98
10 more
- 2020Learning to Recombine and Resample Data for Compositional Generalizationcited by 65
- 2021The paradox of the compositionality of natural language: a neural machine translation case studycited by 58
- 2019Human few-shot learning of compositional instructionscited by 47
- 2020The EOS Decision and Length Extrapolationcited by 46
- 2021Disentangled Sequence to Sequence Learning for Compositional Generalizationcited by 30
- 2020Compositional Networks Enable Systematic Generalization for Grounded Language Understandingcited by 18
- 2020Systematic Generalization on gSCAN with Language Conditioned Embeddingcited by 15
- 2020Think before you act: A simple baseline for compositional generalizationcited by 11
- 2021Iterative Decoding for Compositional Generalization in Transformerscited by 6
- 2019On the Realization of Compositionality in Neural Networkscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.