A Latent-Variable Model for Intrinsic Probing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The success of pre-trained contextualized representations has prompted researchers to analyze them for the presence of linguistic information. Indeed, it is natural to assume that these pre-trained representations do encode some level of linguistic knowledge as they have brought about large empirical improvements on a wide variety of NLP tasks, which suggests they are learning true linguistic generalization. In this work, we focus on intrinsic probing, an analysis technique where the goal is not only to identify whether a representation encodes a linguistic attribute but also to pinpoint where this attribute is encoded. We propose a novel latent-variable formulation for constructing intrinsic probes and derive a tractable variational approximation to the log-likelihood. Our results show that our model is versatile and yields tighter mutual information estimates than two intrinsic probes previously proposed in the literature. Finally, we find empirical evidence that pre-trained representations develop a cross-lingually entangled notion of morphosyntax.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2022.
Builds on
42 of 72 references.
References · 42
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
- 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 436
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 382
30 more
- 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 350
- 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 276
- 2020Understanding the Role of Individual Units in a Deep Neural Networkcited by 254
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 230
- 2016Understanding Neural Networks through Representation Erasurecited by 223
- 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 210
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 204
- 2015Visualizing and Understanding Neural Models in NLPcited by 199
- 2019Assessing BERT's Syntactic Abilitiescited by 191
- 2020Compositional Explanations of Neuronscited by 172
- 2015Visualizing and Understanding Recurrent Networkscited by 158
- 2020Probing Pretrained Language Models for Lexical Semanticscited by 156
- 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 144
- 2018What Is One Grain of Sand in the Desert? Analyzing Individual Neurons in Deep NLP Modelscited by 124
- 2018Identifying and Controlling Important Neurons in Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
- 2018Under the Hood: Using Diagnostic Classifiers to Investigate and Improve how Language Models Track Agreement Informationcited by 97
- 2020Analyzing Individual Neurons in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 97
- 2019The emergence of number and syntax units in LSTM language modelscited by 92
- 2021On the Pitfalls of Analyzing Individual Neurons in Language Modelscited by 61
- 2020Intrinsic Probing through Dimension Selectioncited by 45
- 2020Torch-Struct: Deep Structured Prediction Librarycited by 40
- 2020A Tale of a Probe and a Parsercited by 40
- 2016Representation of linguistic form and function in recurrent neural networkscited by 39
- 2020Probing Linguistic Systematicitycited by 37
- 2019LINSPECTOR: Multilingual Probing Tasks for Word Representationscited by 22
- 2021Rissanen Data Analysis: Examining Dataset Characteristics via Description Lengthcited by 22
- 2021Subword Pooling Makes a Differencecited by 18
- 2017Element-centric clustering comparison unifies overlaps and hierarchycited by 17
- 2018Marrying Universal Dependencies and Universal Morphologycited by 11
- 2019TX-Ray: Quantifying and Explaining Model-Knowledge Transfer in (Un-)Supervised NLPcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Probing the Emergence of Cross-lingual Alignment during LLM Trainingcited by 38
- 2022Same Neurons, Different Languages: Probing Morphosyntax in Multilingual Pre-trained Modelscited by 14
- 2025Linguistic Interpretability of Transformer-based Language Models: a systematic reviewcited by 7
- 2025Reasoning Path and Latent State Analysis for Multi-view Visual Spatial Reasoning: A Cognitive Science Perspectivecited by 2
- 2026The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Models9 Jan 2026
- 2025Reasoning Path and Latent State Analysis for Multi-view Visual Spatial Reasoning: A Cognitive Science Perspective2 Dec 2025
- 2025Linguistic Interpretability of Transformer-based Language Models: a systematic review9 Apr 2025
- 2024Probing the Emergence of Cross-lingual Alignment during LLM Training19 Jun 2024
- 2022Same Neurons, Different Languages: Probing Morphosyntax in Multilingual Pre-trained Models4 May 2022