mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LINSPECTOR: Multilingual Probing Tasks for Word Representations

arXiv 1903.09442 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2019cs.CLcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite an ever growing number of word representation models introduced for a large number of languages, there is a lack of a standardized technique to provide insights into what is captured by these models. Such insights would help the community to get an estimate of the downstream task performance, as well as to design more informed neural architectures, while avoiding extensive experimentation which requires substantial computational resources not all researchers have access to. A recent development in NLP is to use simple classification tasks, also called probing tasks, that test for a single linguistic feature such as part-of-speech. Existing studies mostly focus on exploring the linguistic information encoded by the continuous representations of English text. However, from a typological perspective the morphologically poor English is rather an outlier: the information encoded by the word order and function words in English is often stored on a morphological level in other languages. To address this, we introduce 15 type-level probing tasks such as case marking, possession, word length, morphological tag count and pseudoword identification for 24 languages. We present a reusable methodology for creation and evaluation of such tests in a multilingual setting. We then present experiments on several diverse multilingual word embedding models, in which we relate the probing task performance for a diverse set of languages to a range of five classic NLP tasks: POS-tagging, dependency parsing, semantic role labeling, named entity recognition and natural language inference. We find that a number of probing tests have significantly high positive correlation to the downstream tasks, especially for morphologically rich languages. We show that our tests can be used to explore word embeddings or black-box neural models for linguistic cues in a multilingual setting.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 8; 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024RuBLiMP: Russian Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairscited by 23
  2. 2025Multilingual Pretraining for Pixel Language Modelscited by 12
  3. 2021Shaking Syntactic Trees on the Sesame Street: Multilingual Probing with Controllable Perturbationscited by 10
  4. 2022Interpretation of Black Box NLP Models: A Surveycited by 9
  5. 2023Probing LLMs for Joint Encoding of Linguistic Categoriescited by 9
  6. 2021A multilabel approach to morphosyntactic probingcited by 8
  7. 2023Morphosyntactic probing of multilingual BERT modelscited by 8
  8. 2024Code-Mixed Probes Show How Pre-Trained Models Generalise On Code-Switched Textcited by 7
  9. 2022Evaluation Benchmarks for Spanish Sentence Representationscited by 6
  10. 2021Morph Call: Probing Morphosyntactic Content of Multilingual Transformerscited by 5
  11. 2022A Latent-Variable Model for Intrinsic Probingcited by 5
  12. 2021RuSentEval: Linguistic Source, Encoder Force!cited by 4
10 more
  1. 2022Probing with Noise: Unpicking the Warp and Weft of Embeddingscited by 3
  2. 2022Universal and Independent: Multilingual Probing Framework for Exhaustive Model Interpretation and Evaluationcited by 3
  3. 2024PARADISE: Evaluating Implicit Planning Skills of Language Models with Procedural Warnings and Tips Datasetcited by 3
  4. 2022Russian SuperGLUE 1.1: Revising the Lessons not Learned by Russian NLP modelscited by 2
  5. 2024Pixology: Probing the Linguistic and Visual Capabilities of Pixel-based Language Modelscited by 2
  6. 2022Sentence Ambiguity, Grammaticality and Complexity Probescited by 1
  7. 2024Implicit Priors Editing in Stable Diffusion via Targeted Token Adjustmentcited by 1
  8. 2022Why Do Neural Language Models Still Need Commonsense Knowledge to Handle Semantic Variations in Question Answering?cited by 0
  9. 2023Assessing Linguistic Generalisation in Language Models: A Dataset for Brazilian Portuguesecited by 0
  10. 2026Exposure is Optional: Learning Unlike Coordination in Language Modelscited by 0