mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Neural Ranking Models Online from Implicit User Feedback

arXiv 2201.06658 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2022cs.IR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing online learning to rank (OL2R) solutions are limited to linear models, which are incompetent to capture possible non-linear relations between queries and documents. In this work, to unleash the power of representation learning in OL2R, we propose to directly learn a neural ranking model from users' implicit feedback (e.g., clicks) collected on the fly. We focus on RankNet and LambdaRank, due to their great empirical success and wide adoption in offline settings, and control the notorious explore-exploit trade-off based on the convergence analysis of neural networks using neural tangent kernel. Specifically, in each round of result serving, exploration is only performed on document pairs where the predicted rank order between the two documents is uncertain; otherwise, the ranker's predicted order will be followed in result ranking. We prove that under standard assumptions our OL2R solution achieves a gap-dependent upper regret bound of O(log2(T)), in which the regret is defined on the total number of mis-ordered pairs over T rounds. Comparisons against an extensive set of state-of-the-art OL2R baselines on two public learning to rank benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed solution.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2022.

Builds on

31 of 64 references.

References · 31

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  2. 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
  3. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
  4. 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
  5. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
  6. 2016Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU networkscited by 567
  7. 2016Benefits of depth in neural networkscited by 248
  8. 2019Generalization Bounds of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Wide and Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
  9. 2018Optimal approximation of continuous functions by very deep ReLU networkscited by 165
  10. 2018Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimizes Over-parameterized Deep ReLU Networkscited by 139
  11. 2020Neural Thompson Samplingcited by 127
  12. 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 120
19 more
  1. 2017Approximating Continuous Functions by ReLU Nets of Minimal Widthcited by 120
  2. 2019An Improved Analysis of Training Over-parameterized Deep Neural Networkscited by 120
  3. 2015Representation Benefits of Deep Feedforward Networkscited by 84
  4. 2019How Much Over-parameterization Is Sufficient to Learn Deep ReLU Networks?cited by 84
  5. 2016Why Deep Neural Networks for Function Approximation?cited by 82
  6. 2015Cascading Bandits: Learning to Rank in the Cascade Modelcited by 75
  7. 2019Generalization Error Bounds of Gradient Descent for Learning Over-parameterized Deep ReLU Networkscited by 60
  8. 2017SGD Learns the Conjugate Kernel Class of the Networkcited by 54
  9. 2015Combinatorial Cascading Banditscited by 40
  10. 2018TF-Ranking: Scalable TensorFlow Library for Learning-to-Rankcited by 32
  11. 2018TopRank: A practical algorithm for online stochastic rankingcited by 30
  12. 2017Depth Creates No Bad Local Minimacited by 29
  13. 2017Online Learning to Rank in Stochastic Click Modelscited by 26
  14. 2018Differentiable Unbiased Online Learning to Rankcited by 24
  15. 2018Online Learning to Rank with Featurescited by 18
  16. 2018Efficient Exploration of Gradient Space for Online Learning to Rankcited by 9
  17. 2019Variance Reduction in Gradient Exploration for Online Learning to Rankcited by 8
  18. 2021PairRank: Online Pairwise Learning to Rank by Divide-and-Conquercited by 6
  19. 2017Balancing Speed and Quality in Online Learning to Rank for Information Retrievalcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.