mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FAVER: Blind Quality Prediction of Variable Frame Rate Videos

arXiv 2201.01492 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2022eess.IV cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Video quality assessment (VQA) remains an important and challenging problem that affects many applications at the widest scales. Recent advances in mobile devices and cloud computing techniques have made it possible to capture, process, and share high resolution, high frame rate (HFR) videos across the Internet nearly instantaneously. Being able to monitor and control the quality of these streamed videos can enable the delivery of more enjoyable content and perceptually optimized rate control. Accordingly, there is a pressing need to develop VQA models that can be deployed at enormous scales. While some recent effects have been applied to full-reference (FR) analysis of variable frame rate and HFR video quality, the development of no-reference (NR) VQA algorithms targeting frame rate variations has been little studied. Here, we propose a first-of-a-kind blind VQA model for evaluating HFR videos, which we dub the Framerate-Aware Video Evaluator w/o Reference (FAVER). FAVER uses extended models of spatial natural scene statistics that encompass space-time wavelet-decomposed video signals, to conduct efficient frame rate sensitive quality prediction. Our extensive experiments on several HFR video quality datasets show that FAVER outperforms other blind VQA algorithms at a reasonable computational cost. To facilitate reproducible research and public evaluation, an implementation of FAVER is being made freely available online: urlhttps://github.com/uniqzheng/HFR-BVQA.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2022.

Builds on

20 of 62 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019EnlightenGAN: Deep Light Enhancement without Paired Supervisioncited by 466
  2. 2019DeblurGAN-v2: Deblurring (Orders-of-Magnitude) Faster and Bettercited by 361
  3. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 221
  4. 2019Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videoscited by 164
  5. 2020Patch-VQ: 'Patching Up' the Video Quality Problemcited by 147
  6. 2020UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Contentcited by 140
  7. 2018Large-Scale Study of Perceptual Video Qualitycited by 127
  8. 2019YouTube UGC Dataset for Video Compression Researchcited by 124
  9. 2021RAPIQUE: Rapid and Accurate Video Quality Prediction of User Generated Contentcited by 100
  10. 2021Blindly Assess Quality of In-the-Wild Videos via Quality-aware Pre-training and Motion Perceptioncited by 97
  11. 2016Perceptual Quality Prediction on Authentically Distorted Images Using a Bag of Features Approachcited by 71
  12. 2020ST-GREED: Space-Time Generalized Entropic Differences for Frame Rate Dependent Video Quality Predictioncited by 33
8 more
  1. 2019ProxIQA: A Proxy Approach to Perceptual Optimization of Learned Image Compressioncited by 24
  2. 2020Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of High Frame Rate Videoscited by 24
  3. 2020Predicting the Quality of Compressed Videos with Pre-Existing Distortionscited by 21
  4. 2020BBAND Index: A No-Reference Banding Artifact Predictorcited by 19
  5. 2018SpatioTemporal Feature Integration and Model Fusion for Full Reference Video Quality Assessmentcited by 18
  6. 2021A Subjective and Objective Study of Space-Time Subsampled Video Qualitycited by 14
  7. 2021On the Space-Time Statistics of Motion Picturescited by 4
  8. 2021Space-Time Video Regularity and Visual Fidelity: Compression, Resolution and Frame Rate Adaptationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

10 papers.