mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Banding Artifacts on Compressed Videos

arXiv 2508.08700 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although there have been notable advancements in video compression technologies in recent years, banding artifacts remain a serious issue affecting the quality of compressed videos, particularly on smooth regions of high-definition videos. Noticeable banding artifacts can severely impact the perceptual quality of videos viewed on a high-end HDTV or high-resolution screen. Hence, there is a pressing need for a systematic investigation of the banding video quality assessment problem for advanced video codecs. Given that the existing publicly available datasets for studying banding artifacts are limited to still picture data only, which cannot account for temporal banding dynamics, we have created a first-of-a-kind open video dataset, dubbed LIVE-YT-Banding, which consists of 160 videos generated by four different compression parameters using the AV1 video codec. A total of 7,200 subjective opinions are collected from a cohort of 45 human subjects. To demonstrate the value of this new resources, we tested and compared a variety of models that detect banding occurrences, and measure their impact on perceived quality. Among these, we introduce an effective and efficient new no-reference (NR) video quality evaluator which we call CBAND. CBAND leverages the properties of the learned statistics of natural images expressed in the embeddings of deep neural networks. Our experimental results show that the perceptual banding prediction performance of CBAND significantly exceeds that of previous state-of-the-art models, and is also orders of magnitude faster. Moreover, CBAND can be employed as a differentiable loss function to optimize video debanding models. The LIVE-YT-Banding database, code, and pre-trained model are all publically available at https://github.com/uniqzheng/CBAND.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 107 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2025.

Builds on

44 of 107 references.

References · 44

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  6. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  7. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,143
  8. 2022Simple Baselines for Image Restorationcited by 708
  9. 2017Video Enhancement with Task-Oriented Flowcited by 619
  10. 2017The Perception-Distortion Tradeoffcited by 587
  11. 2023Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levelscited by 503
  12. 2022MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformercited by 476
32 more
  1. 2022Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectivescited by 320
  2. 2022MAXIM: Multi-Axis MLP for Image Processingcited by 302
  3. 2023TOPIQ: A Top-down Approach from Semantics to Distortions for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 226
  4. 2024MambaVision: A Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Vision Backbonecited by 224
  5. 2022FAST-VQA: Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessment with Fragment Samplingcited by 179
  6. 2019Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videoscited by 164
  7. 2020Patch-VQ: 'Patching Up' the Video Quality Problemcited by 147
  8. 2020UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Contentcited by 140
  9. 2019YouTube UGC Dataset for Video Compression Researchcited by 124
  10. 2021RAPIQUE: Rapid and Accurate Video Quality Prediction of User Generated Contentcited by 100
  11. 2020Unified Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videos with Mixed Datasets Trainingcited by 72
  12. 2016Perceptual Quality Prediction on Authentically Distorted Images Using a Bag of Features Approachcited by 71
  13. 2022Neighbourhood Representative Sampling for Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessmentcited by 50
  14. 2020A Technical Overview of AV1cited by 47
  15. 2021Universal Rate-Distortion-Perception Representations for Lossy Compressioncited by 47
  16. 20254KAgent: Agentic Any Image to 4K Super-Resolutioncited by 36
  17. 2017VideoSet: A Large-Scale Compressed Video Quality Dataset Based on JND Measurementcited by 33
  18. 2024Modular Blind Video Quality Assessmentcited by 23
  19. 2018Implicit Dual-domain Convolutional Network for Robust Color Image Compression Artifact Reductioncited by 20
  20. 2020BBAND Index: A No-Reference Banding Artifact Predictorcited by 19
  21. 2020A Simple Model for Subject Behavior in Subjective Experimentscited by 15
  22. 2024Video Quality Assessment: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 15
  23. 2024Scaling and Masking: A New Paradigm of Data Sampling for Image and Video Quality Assessmentcited by 13
  24. 2019PEA265: Perceptual Assessment of Video Compression Artifactscited by 10
  25. 2022FAVER: Blind Quality Prediction of Variable Frame Rate Videoscited by 10
  26. 2021CAMBI: Contrast-aware Multiscale Banding Indexcited by 9
  27. 2023BAND-2k: Banding Artifact Noticeable Database for Banding Detection and Quality Assessmentcited by 5
  28. 2022Banding vs. Quality: Perceptual Impact and Objective Assessmentcited by 4
  29. 2023FS-BAND: A Frequency-Sensitive Banding Detectorcited by 3
  30. 2021Deep Image Debandingcited by 2
  31. 2024Unicorn: Unified Neural Image Compression with One Number Reconstructioncited by 2
  32. 2019Modeling Generalized Rate-Distortion Functionscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.