mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Scaling-up Empirical Risk Minimization: Optimization of Incomplete U-statistics

arXiv 1501.02629 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2015stat.ML cs.AI cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In a wide range of statistical learning problems such as ranking, clustering or metric learning among others, the risk is accurately estimated by U-statistics of degree d≥ 1, i.e. functionals of the training data with low variance that take the form of averages over k-tuples. From a computational perspective, the calculation of such statistics is highly expensive even for a moderate sample size n, as it requires averaging O(nd) terms. This makes learning procedures relying on the optimization of such data functionals hardly feasible in practice. It is the major goal of this paper to show that, strikingly, such empirical risks can be replaced by drastically computationally simpler Monte-Carlo estimates based on O(n) terms only, usually referred to as incomplete U-statistics, without damaging the O_mathbbP(1/√n) learning rate of Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) procedures. For this purpose, we establish uniform deviation results describing the error made when approximating a U-process by its incomplete version under appropriate complexity assumptions. Extensions to model selection, fast rate situations and various sampling techniques are also considered, as well as an application to stochastic gradient descent for ERM. Finally, numerical examples are displayed in order to provide strong empirical evidence that the approach we promote largely surpasses more naive subsampling techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 7.

17 papers.

Sort: