mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Differentially Private Domain Adaptation with Theoretical Guarantees

arXiv 2306.08838 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.CR stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In many applications, the labeled data at the learner's disposal is subject to privacy constraints and is relatively limited. To derive a more accurate predictor for the target domain, it is often beneficial to leverage publicly available labeled data from an alternative domain, somewhat close to the target domain. This is the modern problem of supervised domain adaptation from a public source to a private target domain. We present two (ε, δ)-differentially private adaptation algorithms for supervised adaptation, for which we make use of a general optimization problem, recently shown to benefit from favorable theoretical learning guarantees. Our first algorithm is designed for regression with linear predictors and shown to solve a convex optimization problem. Our second algorithm is a more general solution for loss functions that may be non-convex but Lipschitz and smooth. While our main objective is a theoretical analysis, we also report the results of several experiments first demonstrating that the non-private versions of our algorithms outperform adaptation baselines and next showing that, for larger values of the target sample size or ε, the performance of our private algorithms remains close to that of the non-private formulation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2023.

Builds on

28 of 77 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  4. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  5. 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 635
  6. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 346
  7. 2019Bridging Theory and Algorithm for Domain Adaptationcited by 332
  8. 2019Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 307
  9. 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 218
  10. 2019Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Optimal Ratescited by 186
  11. 2013Mini-batch Stochastic Approximation Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Composite Optimizationcited by 143
  12. 2018Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More Generalcited by 128
16 more
  1. 2022Position: Considerations for Differentially Private Learning with Large-Scale Public Pretrainingcited by 88
  2. 2020On the Value of Target Data in Transfer Learningcited by 65
  3. 2014Private Learning and Sanitization: Pure vs. Approximate Differential Privacycited by 63
  4. 2015Between Pure and Approximate Differential Privacycited by 56
  5. 2019Limits of Private Learning with Access to Public Datacited by 39
  6. 2018A Simple Proximal Stochastic Gradient Method for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 33
  7. 2022Private Estimation with Public Datacited by 32
  8. 2020Private Query Release Assisted by Public Datacited by 27
  9. 2020A One-step Approach to Covariate Shift Adaptationcited by 21
  10. 2019Privately Answering Classification Queries in the Agnostic PAC Modelcited by 18
  11. 2021Discrepancy-Based Active Learning for Domain Adaptationcited by 17
  12. 2020On Localized Discrepancy for Domain Adaptationcited by 14
  13. 2021Rethinking Importance Weighting for Transfer Learningcited by 11
  14. 2023Best-Effort Adaptationcited by 7
  15. 2020Can We Find Near-Approximately-Stationary Points of Nonsmooth Nonconvex Functions?cited by 4
  16. 2022Private Domain Adaptation from a Public Sourcecited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.