Characterizing and addressing the issue of oversmoothing in neural autoregressive sequence modeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural autoregressive sequence models smear the probability among many possible sequences including degenerate ones, such as empty or repetitive sequences. In this work, we tackle one specific case where the model assigns a high probability to unreasonably short sequences. We define the oversmoothing rate to quantify this issue. After confirming the high degree of oversmoothing in neural machine translation, we propose to explicitly minimize the oversmoothing rate during training. We conduct a set of experiments to study the effect of the proposed regularization on both model distribution and decoding performance. We use a neural machine translation task as the testbed and consider three different datasets of varying size. Our experiments reveal three major findings. First, we can control the oversmoothing rate of the model by tuning the strength of the regularization. Second, by enhancing the oversmoothing loss contribution, the probability and the rank of <eos> token decrease heavily at positions where it is not supposed to be. Third, the proposed regularization impacts the outcome of beam search especially when a large beam is used. The degradation of translation quality (measured in BLEU) with a large beam significantly lessens with lower oversmoothing rate, but the degradation compared to smaller beam sizes remains to exist. From these observations, we conclude that the high degree of oversmoothing is the main reason behind the degenerate case of overly probable short sequences in a neural autoregressive model.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2021.
Builds on
24 of 25 references.
References · 24
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,024
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,981
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,910
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,893
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,979
- 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,487
- 2020Recipes for building an open-domain chatbotcited by 593
- 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 494
- 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 335
12 more
- 2018Scaling Neural Machine Translationcited by 204
- 2019Facebook FAIR's WMT19 News Translation Task Submissioncited by 179
- 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 138
- 2018Correcting Length Bias in Neural Machine Translationcited by 119
- 2019On NMT Search Errors and Model Errors: Cat Got Your Tongue?cited by 114
- 2021Understanding the Properties of Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding in Neural Machine Translationcited by 56
- 2020Consistency of a Recurrent Language Model With Respect to Incomplete Decodingcited by 54
- 2020The EOS Decision and Length Extrapolationcited by 46
- 2021Smoothing and Shrinking the Sparse Seq2Seq Search Spacecited by 11
- 2021Data Augmentation by Concatenation for Low-Resource Translation: A Mystery and a Solutioncited by 11
- 2020Why Neural Machine Translation Prefers Empty Outputscited by 6
- 2020Investigating the Decoders of Maximum Likelihood Sequence Models: A Look-ahead Approachcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2024The Hidden Attention of Mamba Modelscited by 89
- 2022Reward Gaming in Conditional Text Generationcited by 29
- 2023Tailoring Language Generation Models under Total Variation Distancecited by 27
- 2024Towards Optimal Learning of Language Modelscited by 7
- 2024An Autoregressive Text-to-Graph Framework for Joint Entity and Relation Extractioncited by 5
- 2022A Continuum of Generation Tasks for Investigating Length Bias and Degenerate Repetitioncited by 3
- 2023Injecting knowledge into language generation: a case study in auto-charting after-visit care instructions from medical dialoguecited by 3
- 2022The Implicit Length Bias of Label Smoothing on Beam Search Decodingcited by 2
- 2025The Devil is in the EOS: Sequence Training for Detailed Image Captioningcited by 1
- 2026Stability as a Liability:Systematic Breakdown of Linguistic Structure in LLMscited by 0
- 2026Stability as a Liability:Systematic Breakdown of Linguistic Structure in LLMs26 Jan 2026
- 2025The Devil is in the EOS: Sequence Training for Detailed Image Captioning26 Jul 2025
- 2024The Hidden Attention of Mamba Models3 Mar 2024
- 2024Towards Optimal Learning of Language Models27 Feb 2024
- 2024An Autoregressive Text-to-Graph Framework for Joint Entity and Relation Extraction2 Jan 2024
- 2023Injecting knowledge into language generation: a case study in auto-charting after-visit care instructions from medical dialogue6 Jun 2023
- 2023Tailoring Language Generation Models under Total Variation Distance26 Feb 2023
- 2022Reward Gaming in Conditional Text Generation16 Nov 2022
- 2022A Continuum of Generation Tasks for Investigating Length Bias and Degenerate Repetition19 Oct 2022
- 2022The Implicit Length Bias of Label Smoothing on Beam Search Decoding2 May 2022