A Continuum of Generation Tasks for Investigating Length Bias and Degenerate Repetition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models suffer from various degenerate behaviors. These differ between tasks: machine translation (MT) exhibits length bias, while tasks like story generation exhibit excessive repetition. Recent work has attributed the difference to task constrainedness, but evidence for this claim has always involved many confounding variables. To study this question directly, we introduce a new experimental framework that allows us to smoothly vary task constrainedness, from MT at one end to fully open-ended generation at the other, while keeping all other aspects fixed. We find that: (1) repetition decreases smoothly with constrainedness, explaining the difference in repetition across tasks; (2) length bias surprisingly also decreases with constrainedness, suggesting some other cause for the difference in length bias; (3) across the board, these problems affect the mode, not the whole distribution; (4) the differences cannot be attributed to a change in the entropy of the distribution, since another method of changing the entropy, label smoothing, does not produce the same effect.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2022.
Builds on
24 of 31 references.
References · 24
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,457
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,910
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,893
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,473
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,186
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 986
- 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 494
- 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 335
- 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
- 2019Transformers without Tears: Improving the Normalization of Self-Attentioncited by 153
- 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 138
12 more
- 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
- 2018Correcting Length Bias in Neural Machine Translationcited by 119
- 2019On NMT Search Errors and Model Errors: Cat Got Your Tongue?cited by 114
- 2016Modeling Coverage for Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
- 2020Trading Off Diversity and Quality in Natural Language Generationcited by 94
- 2022On Decoding Strategies for Neural Text Generatorscited by 89
- 2020A Systematic Characterization of Sampling Algorithms for Open-ended Language Generationcited by 28
- 2019How Decoding Strategies Affect the Verifiability of Generated Textcited by 27
- 2020Decoding Methods for Neural Narrative Generationcited by 18
- 2021Smoothing and Shrinking the Sparse Seq2Seq Search Spacecited by 11
- 2021Characterizing and addressing the issue of oversmoothing in neural autoregressive sequence modelingcited by 10
- 2022Uncertainty Determines the Adequacy of the Mode and the Tractability of Decoding in Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
3 papers.