Clustering Effect of (Linearized) Adversarial Robust Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial robustness has received increasing attention along with the study of adversarial examples. So far, existing works show that robust models not only obtain robustness against various adversarial attacks but also boost the performance in some downstream tasks. However, the underlying mechanism of adversarial robustness is still not clear. In this paper, we interpret adversarial robustness from the perspective of linear components, and find that there exist some statistical properties for comprehensively robust models. Specifically, robust models show obvious hierarchical clustering effect on their linearized sub-networks, when removing or replacing all non-linear components (e.g., batch normalization, maximum pooling, or activation layers). Based on these observations, we propose a novel understanding of adversarial robustness and apply it on more tasks including domain adaption and robustness boosting. Experimental evaluations demonstrate the rationality and superiority of our proposed clustering strategy.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2021.
Builds on
28 of 38 references.
References · 28
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
- 2017Parseval Networks: Improving Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 288
16 more
- 2020Skip Connections Matter: On the Transferability of Adversarial Examples Generated with ResNetscited by 165
- 2020BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 155
- 2018ComDefend: An Efficient Image Compression Model to Defend Adversarial Examplescited by 104
- 2019NATTACK: Learning the Distributions of Adversarial Examples for an Improved Black-Box Attack on Deep Neural Networkscited by 94
- 2018Improving DNN Robustness to Adversarial Attacks using Jacobian Regularizationcited by 88
- 2020Backpropagating Linearly Improves Transferability of Adversarial Examplescited by 79
- 2021Improving Adversarial Robustness via Channel-wise Activation Suppressingcited by 76
- 2016Defensive Distillation is Not Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 60
- 2018Deep Defense: Training DNNs with Improved Adversarial Robustnesscited by 41
- 2020Improving Query Efficiency of Black-box Adversarial Attackcited by 34
- 2021Analysis and Applications of Class-wise Robustness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 33
- 2019Batch Normalization is a Cause of Adversarial Vulnerabilitycited by 28
- 2017Residual Convolutional CTC Networks for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 21
- 2019Adversarial Defense via Local Flatness Regularizationcited by 9
- 2020Improve Generalization and Robustness of Neural Networks via Weight Scale Shifting Invariant Regularizationscited by 9
- 2019Adversarial Training is a Form of Data-dependent Operator Norm Regularizationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3.
3 papers.