mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Regret Analysis of Policy Optimization over Submanifolds for Linearly Constrained Online LQG

arXiv 2403.08553 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2024math.OC cs.LG cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancement in online optimization and control has provided novel tools to study online linear quadratic regulator (LQR) problems, where cost matrices are time-varying and unknown in advance. In this work, we study the online linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) problem over the manifold of stabilizing controllers that are linearly constrained to impose physical conditions such as sparsity. By adopting a Riemannian perspective, we propose the online Newton on manifold (ONM) algorithm, which generates an online controller on-the-fly based on the second-order information of the cost function sequence. To quantify the algorithm performance, we use the notion of regret, defined as the sub-optimality of the algorithm cumulative cost against a (locally) minimizing controller sequence. We establish a regret bound in terms of the path-length of the benchmark minimizer sequence, and we further verify the effectiveness of ONM via simulations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2024.

Builds on

27 of 44 references.

References · 27

  1. 2018Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 250
  2. 2013Optimization, Learning, and Games with Predictable Sequencescited by 188
  3. 2013Non-stationary Stochastic Optimizationcited by 175
  4. 2017On the Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 159
  5. 2018Adaptive Online Learning in Dynamic Environmentscited by 133
  6. 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 116
  7. 2019Online Control with Adversarial Disturbancescited by 92
  8. 2020Improper Learning for Non-Stochastic Controlcited by 83
  9. 2018Online Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 56
  10. 2019The Nonstochastic Control Problemcited by 52
  11. 2019Formulas for Data-driven Control: Stabilization, Optimality and Robustnesscited by 47
  12. 2019Convergence and sample complexity of gradient methods for the model-free linear quadratic regulator problemcited by 46
15 more
  1. 2019LQR through the Lens of First Order Methods: Discrete-time Casecited by 40
  2. 2019Logarithmic Regret for Online Controlcited by 38
  3. 2021Non-stationary Online Learning with Memory and Non-stochastic Controlcited by 33
  4. 2020Online Optimal Control with Affine Constraintscited by 20
  5. 2020Policy Gradient-based Algorithms for Continuous-time Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 13
  6. 2024Data-Enabled Policy Optimization for Direct Adaptive Learning of the LQRcited by 9
  7. 2020Low-complexity Learning of Linear Quadratic Regulators from Noisy Datacited by 8
  8. 2022Optimal Dynamic Regret in LQR Controlcited by 6
  9. 2020Distributed Online Linear Quadratic Control for Linear Time-invariant Systemscited by 5
  10. 2021On the Certainty-Equivalence Approach to Direct Data-Driven LQR Designcited by 5
  11. 2022Policy Optimization over Submanifolds for Linearly Constrained Feedback Synthesiscited by 5
  12. 2021Dynamic Regret Minimization for Control of Non-stationary Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 4
  13. 2022Implications of Regret on Stability of Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 3
  14. 2023Learning Robust Data-based LQG Controllers from Noisy Datacited by 3
  15. 2023A Framework on Fully Distributed State Estimation and Cooperative Stabilization of LTI Plantscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.