Federated Learning With Individualized Privacy Through Client Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With growing concerns about user data collection, individualized privacy has emerged as a promising solution to balance protection and utility by accounting for diverse user privacy preferences. Instead of enforcing a uniform level of anonymization for all users, this approach allows individuals to choose privacy settings that align with their comfort levels. Building on this idea, we propose an adapted method for enabling Individualized Differential Privacy (IDP) in Federated Learning (FL) by handling clients according to their personal privacy preferences. By extending the SAMPLE algorithm from centralized settings to FL, we calculate client-specific sampling rates based on their heterogeneous privacy budgets and integrate them into a modified IDP-FedAvg algorithm. We test this method under realistic privacy distributions and multiple datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach achieves clear improvements over uniform DP baselines, reducing the trade-off between privacy and utility. Compared to the alternative SCALE method in related work, which assigns differing noise scales to clients, our method performs notably better. However, challenges remain for complex tasks with non-i.i.d. data, primarily stemming from the constraints of the decentralized setting.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2025.
Builds on
15 of 31 references.
References · 15
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 780
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 528
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 380
- 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 218
- 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
- 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 126
- 2020When Machine Learning Meets Privacy: A Survey and Outlookcited by 67
- 2020LDP-FL: Practical Private Aggregation in Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacycited by 63
- 2015Heterogeneous Differential Privacycited by 30
- 2023Have it your way: Individualized Privacy Assignment for DP-SGDcited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Learning from Anonymized and Incomplete Tabular Datacited by 0
- 2026Learning from Anonymized and Incomplete Tabular Data1 Feb 2026