mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Aligning XAI with EU Regulations for Smart Biomedical Devices: A Methodology for Compliance Analysis

arXiv 2408.15121 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2024cs.AI cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Significant investment and development have gone into integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical and healthcare applications, leading to advanced control systems in medical technology. However, the opacity of AI systems raises concerns about essential characteristics needed in such sensitive applications, like transparency and trustworthiness. Our study addresses these concerns by investigating a process for selecting the most adequate Explainable AI (XAI) methods to comply with the explanation requirements of key EU regulations in the context of smart bioelectronics for medical devices. The adopted methodology starts with categorising smart devices by their control mechanisms (open-loop, closed-loop, and semi-closed-loop systems) and delving into their technology. Then, we analyse these regulations to define their explainability requirements for the various devices and related goals. Simultaneously, we classify XAI methods by their explanatory objectives. This allows for matching legal explainability requirements with XAI explanatory goals and determining the suitable XAI algorithms for achieving them. Our findings provide a nuanced understanding of which XAI algorithms align better with EU regulations for different types of medical devices. We demonstrate this through practical case studies on different neural implants, from chronic disease management to advanced prosthetics. This study fills a crucial gap in aligning XAI applications in bioelectronics with stringent provisions of EU regulations. It provides a practical framework for developers and researchers, ensuring their AI innovations advance healthcare technology and adhere to legal and ethical standards.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2024.

Builds on

15 of 54 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  2. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,316
  3. 2018Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negativescited by 262
  4. 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 252
  5. 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
  6. 2018Boolean Decision Rules via Column Generationcited by 79
  7. 2020Shapley Flow: A Graph-based Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 51
  8. 2017Interpretability via Model Extractioncited by 40
  9. 2021Question-Driven Design Process for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 31
  10. 2023TempSAL -- Uncovering Temporal Information for Deep Saliency Predictioncited by 25
  11. 2021An Objective Metric for Explainable AI: How and Why to Estimate the Degree of Explainabilitycited by 15
  12. 2023Natural Example-Based Explainability: a Surveycited by 13
3 more
  1. 2021Modelling GDPR-Compliant Explanations for Trustworthy AIcited by 8
  2. 2021A Survey on Methods and Metrics for the Assessment of Explainability under the Proposed AI Actcited by 8
  3. 2020Brain Co-Processors: Using AI to Restore and Augment Brain Functioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.