mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Scaling Laws for the Few-Shot Adaptation of Pre-trained Image Classifiers

arXiv 2110.06990 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Empirical science of neural scaling laws is a rapidly growing area of significant importance to the future of machine learning, particularly in the light of recent breakthroughs achieved by large-scale pre-trained models such as GPT-3, CLIP and DALL-e. Accurately predicting the neural network performance with increasing resources such as data, compute and model size provides a more comprehensive evaluation of different approaches across multiple scales, as opposed to traditional point-wise comparisons of fixed-size models on fixed-size benchmarks, and, most importantly, allows for focus on the best-scaling, and thus most promising in the future, approaches. In this work, we consider a challenging problem of few-shot learning in image classification, especially when the target data distribution in the few-shot phase is different from the source, training, data distribution, in a sense that it includes new image classes not encountered during training. Our current main goal is to investigate how the amount of pre-training data affects the few-shot generalization performance of standard image classifiers. Our key observations are that (1) such performance improvements are well-approximated by power laws (linear log-log plots) as the training set size increases, (2) this applies to both cases of target data coming from either the same or from a different domain (i.e., new classes) as the training data, and (3) few-shot performance on new classes converges at a faster rate than the standard classification performance on previously seen classes. Our findings shed new light on the relationship between scale and generalization.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2021.

Builds on

22 of 27 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  6. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  7. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  8. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  9. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
  10. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  11. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  12. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
10 more
  1. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
  3. 2019Meta-Dataset: A Dataset of Datasets for Learning to Learn from Few Examplescited by 312
  4. 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 265
  5. 2021Pretrained Transformers as Universal Computation Enginescited by 162
  6. 2020On Robustness and Transferability of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 98
  7. 2018Bias and Generalization in Deep Generative Models: An Empirical Studycited by 83
  8. 2021Out of Distribution Generalization in Machine Learningcited by 59
  9. 2020Natural Language Processing Advancements By Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 50
  10. 2019Survey on Deep Neural Networks in Speech and Vision Systemscited by 37

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 4.

8 papers.