mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Nash Convergence of Mean-Based Learning Algorithms in First-Price Auctions

arXiv 2110.03906 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2021cs.GT cs.AI cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The convergence properties of learning dynamics in repeated auctions is a timely and important question, with numerous applications in, e.g., online advertising markets. This work focuses on repeated first-price auctions where bidders with fixed values learn to bid using mean-based algorithms -- a large class of online learning algorithms that include popular no-regret algorithms such as Multiplicative Weights Update and Follow the Perturbed Leader. We completely characterize the learning dynamics of mean-based algorithms, under two notions of convergence: (1) time-average: the fraction of rounds where bidders play a Nash equilibrium converges to 1; (2) last-iterate: the mixed strategy profile of bidders converges to a Nash equilibrium. Specifically, the results depend on the number of bidders with the highest value: - If the number is at least three, the dynamics almost surely converges to a Nash equilibrium of the auction, in both time-average and last-iterate. - If the number is two, the dynamics almost surely converges to a Nash equilibrium in time-average but not necessarily last-iterate. - If the number is one, the dynamics may not converge to a Nash equilibrium in time-average or last-iterate. Our discovery opens up new possibilities in the study of the convergence of learning dynamics.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2021.

Builds on

22 of 60 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Cycles in adversarial regularized learningcited by 122
  2. 2018Last-Iterate Convergence: Zero-Sum Games and Constrained Min-Max Optimizationcited by 98
  3. 2020No-regret learning and mixed Nash equilibria: They do not mixcited by 49
  4. 2017Selling to a No-Regret Buyercited by 43
  5. 2015Online learning in repeated auctionscited by 39
  6. 2013Learning Prices for Repeated Auctions with Strategic Buyerscited by 37
  7. 2017Learning to Bid Without Knowing your Valuecited by 34
  8. 2020Dynamic Incentive-aware Learning: Robust Pricing in Contextual Auctionscited by 34
  9. 2020Learning to Bid Optimally and Efficiently in Adversarial First-price Auctionscited by 33
  10. 2018Contextual Bandits with Cross-learningcited by 31
  11. 2015Econometrics for Learning Agentscited by 23
  12. 2021Learning to Bid in Contextual First Price Auctionscited by 19
10 more
  1. 2020Convergence Analysis of No-Regret Bidding Algorithms in Repeated Auctionscited by 14
  2. 2018Learning Optimal Reserve Price against Non-myopic Bidderscited by 10
  3. 2020Learning Utilities and Equilibria in Non-Truthful Auctionscited by 8
  4. 2014Perfect Bayesian Equilibria in Repeated Salescited by 6
  5. 2019Bayesian Nash Equilibrium in First-Price Auction with Discrete Value Distributionscited by 6
  6. 2021On the Complexity of Equilibrium Computation in First-Price Auctionscited by 6
  7. 2020Why Do Competitive Markets Converge to First-Price Auctions?cited by 5
  8. 2019No-Regret Learning from Partially Observed Data in Repeated Auctionscited by 4
  9. 2020Dynamic Reserve Prices for Repeated Auctions: Learning from Bidscited by 4
  10. 2020A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Empirical Revenue Maximization Algorithm with Endogenous Samplingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

8 papers.