mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MC-LCR: Multi-modal contrastive classification by locally correlated representations for effective face forgery detection

arXiv 2110.03290 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2021cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As the remarkable development of facial manipulation technologies is accompanied by severe security concerns, face forgery detection has become a recent research hotspot. Most existing detection methods train a binary classifier under global supervision to judge real or fake. However, advanced manipulations only perform small-scale tampering, posing challenges to comprehensively capture subtle and local forgery artifacts, especially in high compression settings and cross-dataset scenarios. To address such limitations, we propose a novel framework named Multi-modal Contrastive Classification by Locally Correlated Representations(MC-LCR), for effective face forgery detection. Instead of specific appearance features, our MC-LCR aims to amplify implicit local discrepancies between authentic and forged faces from both spatial and frequency domains. Specifically, we design the shallow style representation block that measures the pairwise correlation of shallow feature maps, which encodes local style information to extract more discriminative features in the spatial domain. Moreover, we make a key observation that subtle forgery artifacts can be further exposed in the patch-wise phase and amplitude spectrum and exhibit different clues. According to the complementarity of amplitude and phase information, we develop a patch-wise amplitude and phase dual attention module to capture locally correlated inconsistencies with each other in the frequency domain. Besides the above two modules, we further introduce the collaboration of supervised contrastive loss with cross-entropy loss. It helps the network learn more discriminative and generalized representations. Through extensive experiments and comprehensive studies, we achieve state-of-the-art performance and demonstrate the robustness and generalization of our method.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2021.

Builds on

42 of 65 references.

References · 42

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  4. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  5. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  6. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  7. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  8. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
  9. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
  10. 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 631
  11. 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 573
  12. 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 518
30 more
  1. 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
  2. 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 469
  3. 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
  4. 2021Multi-attentional Deepfake Detectioncited by 339
  5. 2018Exposing DeepFake Videos By Detecting Face Warping Artifactscited by 318
  6. 2018Exposing Deep Fakes Using Inconsistent Head Posescited by 294
  7. 2019Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Imagescited by 293
  8. 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 278
  9. 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 272
  10. 2021Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Featurescited by 261
  11. 2019On the Detection of Digital Face Manipulationcited by 259
  12. 2019Deferred Neural Rendering: Image Synthesis using Neural Texturescited by 253
  13. 2020DeeperForensics-1.0: A Large-Scale Dataset for Real-World Face Forgery Detectioncited by 251
  14. 2021Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domaincited by 241
  15. 2020Global Texture Enhancement for Fake Face Detection in the Wildcited by 220
  16. 2018DeepFakes: a New Threat to Face Recognition? Assessment and Detectioncited by 208
  17. 2018Capsule-Forensics: Using Capsule Networks to Detect Forged Images and Videoscited by 180
  18. 2020Two-branch Recurrent Network for Isolating Deepfakes in Videoscited by 161
  19. 2018Learning Rich Features for Image Manipulation Detectioncited by 154
  20. 2016Variational Autoencoder for Deep Learning of Images, Labels and Captionscited by 137
  21. 2021Frequency-aware Discriminative Feature Learning Supervised by Single-Center Loss for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 133
  22. 2019Multi-task Learning For Detecting and Segmenting Manipulated Facial Images and Videoscited by 130
  23. 2018Two-Stream Neural Networks for Tampered Face Detectioncited by 125
  24. 2019Recurrent Convolutional Strategies for Face Manipulation Detection in Videoscited by 118
  25. 2021M2TR: Multi-modal Multi-scale Transformers for Deepfake Detectioncited by 114
  26. 2021Local Relation Learning for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 100
  27. 2019Unmasking DeepFakes with simple Featurescited by 78
  28. 2020Video Face Manipulation Detection Through Ensemble of CNNscited by 63
  29. 2017Recasting Residual-based Local Descriptors as Convolutional Neural Networks: an Application to Image Forgery Detectioncited by 56
  30. 2020Sharp Multiple Instance Learning for DeepFake Video Detectioncited by 54

Built on by

Not cited yet.