The Unreasonable Effectiveness of the Baseline: Discussing SVMs in Legal Text Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We aim to highlight an interesting trend to contribute to the ongoing debate around advances within legal Natural Language Processing. Recently, the focus for most legal text classification tasks has shifted towards large pre-trained deep learning models such as BERT. In this paper, we show that a more traditional approach based on Support Vector Machine classifiers reaches surprisingly competitive performance with BERT-based models on the classification tasks in the LexGLUE benchmark. We also highlight that error reduction obtained by using specialised BERT-based models over baselines is noticeably smaller in the legal domain when compared to general language tasks. We present and discuss three hypotheses as potential explanations for these results to support future discussions.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2021.
Builds on
10 of 15 references.
References · 10
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
- 2019How to Fine-Tune BERT for Text Classification?cited by 409
- 2019Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in Englishcited by 208
- 2021When Does Pretraining Help? Assessing Self-Supervised Learning for Law and the CaseHOLD Datasetcited by 199
- 2020Metrics for Multi-Class Classification: an Overviewcited by 140
- 2020LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets straight out of Law Schoolcited by 111
- 2021MultiEURLEX -- A multi-lingual and multi-label legal document classification dataset for zero-shot cross-lingual transfercited by 89
- 2021Paragraph-level Rationale Extraction through Regularization: A case study on European Court of Human Rights Casescited by 77
- 2018CLAUDETTE: an Automated Detector of Potentially Unfair Clauses in Online Terms of Servicecited by 72
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Large Language Models in the Workplace: A Case Study on Prompt Engineering for Job Type Classificationcited by 17
- 2022On the Role of Negative Precedent in Legal Outcome Predictioncited by 16
- 2023Leveraging Task Dependency and Contrastive Learning for Case Outcome Classification on European Court of Human Rights Casescited by 12
- 2024A Small Claims Court for the NLP: Judging Legal Text Classification Strategies With Small Datasetscited by 1
- 2026LLM-Assisted Causal Structure Disambiguation and Factor Extraction for Legal Judgment Predictioncited by 0
- 2026LLM-Assisted Causal Structure Disambiguation and Factor Extraction for Legal Judgment Prediction12 Mar 2026
- 2024A Small Claims Court for the NLP: Judging Legal Text Classification Strategies With Small Datasets9 Sep 2024
- 2023Large Language Models in the Workplace: A Case Study on Prompt Engineering for Job Type Classification13 Mar 2023
- 2023Leveraging Task Dependency and Contrastive Learning for Case Outcome Classification on European Court of Human Rights Cases1 Feb 2023
- 2022On the Role of Negative Precedent in Legal Outcome Prediction17 Aug 2022