mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of the Baseline: Discussing SVMs in Legal Text Classification

arXiv 2109.07234 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2021cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We aim to highlight an interesting trend to contribute to the ongoing debate around advances within legal Natural Language Processing. Recently, the focus for most legal text classification tasks has shifted towards large pre-trained deep learning models such as BERT. In this paper, we show that a more traditional approach based on Support Vector Machine classifiers reaches surprisingly competitive performance with BERT-based models on the classification tasks in the LexGLUE benchmark. We also highlight that error reduction obtained by using specialised BERT-based models over baselines is noticeably smaller in the legal domain when compared to general language tasks. We present and discuss three hypotheses as potential explanations for these results to support future discussions.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2021.

Builds on

10 of 15 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
  3. 2019How to Fine-Tune BERT for Text Classification?cited by 409
  4. 2019Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in Englishcited by 208
  5. 2021When Does Pretraining Help? Assessing Self-Supervised Learning for Law and the CaseHOLD Datasetcited by 199
  6. 2020Metrics for Multi-Class Classification: an Overviewcited by 140
  7. 2020LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets straight out of Law Schoolcited by 111
  8. 2021MultiEURLEX -- A multi-lingual and multi-label legal document classification dataset for zero-shot cross-lingual transfercited by 89
  9. 2021Paragraph-level Rationale Extraction through Regularization: A case study on European Court of Human Rights Casescited by 77
  10. 2018CLAUDETTE: an Automated Detector of Potentially Unfair Clauses in Online Terms of Servicecited by 72

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.