mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robustness Disparities in Commercial Face Detection

arXiv 2108.12508 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2021cs.CY cs.AI cs.CVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Facial detection and analysis systems have been deployed by large companies and critiqued by scholars and activists for the past decade. Critiques that focus on system performance analyze disparity of the system's output, i.e., how frequently is a face detected for different Fitzpatrick skin types or perceived genders. However, we focus on the robustness of these system outputs under noisy natural perturbations. We present the first of its kind detailed benchmark of the robustness of three such systems: Amazon Rekognition, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform. We use both standard and recently released academic facial datasets to quantitatively analyze trends in robustness for each. Across all the datasets and systems, we generally find that photos of individuals who are older, masculine presenting, of darker skin type, or have dim lighting are more susceptible to errors than their counterparts in other identities.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2021.

Builds on

28 of 68 references.

References · 28

  1. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  3. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  4. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  5. 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
  6. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
  7. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  8. 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
  9. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  10. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  11. 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 192
  12. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
16 more
  1. 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 153
  2. 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
  3. 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 141
  4. 2019Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 125
  5. 2021LowKey: Leveraging Adversarial Attacks to Protect Social Media Users from Facial Recognitioncited by 94
  6. 2021Towards Measuring Fairness in AI: the Casual Conversations Datasetcited by 80
  7. 2020Fairness Through Robustness: Investigating Robustness Disparity in Deep Learningcited by 56
  8. 2018Racial categories in machine learningcited by 48
  9. 2021A Step Toward More Inclusive People Annotations for Fairnesscited by 46
  10. 2018FNNC: Achieving Fairness through Neural Networkscited by 43
  11. 2017Google's Cloud Vision API Is Not Robust To Noisecited by 37
  12. 2020Intra-Processing Methods for Debiasing Neural Networkscited by 27
  13. 2020Minimax Group Fairness: Algorithms and Experimentscited by 17
  14. 2020On the Robustness of Face Recognition Algorithms Against Attacks and Biascited by 16
  15. 2016Can we still avoid automatic face detection?cited by 7
  16. 2021Exploring a Makeup Support System for Transgender Passing based on Automatic Gender Recognitioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 6; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

11 papers.