Social Norm Bias: Residual Harms of Fairness-Aware Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many modern machine learning algorithms mitigate bias by enforcing fairness constraints across coarsely-defined groups related to a sensitive attribute like gender or race. However, these algorithms seldom account for within-group heterogeneity and biases that may disproportionately affect some members of a group. In this work, we characterize Social Norm Bias (SNoB), a subtle but consequential type of algorithmic discrimination that may be exhibited by machine learning models, even when these systems achieve group fairness objectives. We study this issue through the lens of gender bias in occupation classification. We quantify SNoB by measuring how an algorithm's predictions are associated with conformity to inferred gender norms. When predicting if an individual belongs to a male-dominated occupation, this framework reveals that "fair" classifiers still favor biographies written in ways that align with inferred masculine norms. We compare SNoB across algorithmic fairness methods and show that it is frequently a residual bias, and post-processing approaches do not mitigate this type of bias at all.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2021.
Builds on
39 of 103 references.
References · 39
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 703
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
27 more
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 346
- 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
- 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
- 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
- 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214
- 2017Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representationscited by 207
- 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 170
- 2019Predictive Multiplicity in Classificationcited by 162
- 2018Reducing Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 152
- 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
- 2019Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 124
- 2021Challenges in Automated Debiasing for Toxic Language Detectioncited by 95
- 2019Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolutioncited by 84
- 2020Unmasking Contextual Stereotypes: Measuring and Mitigating BERT's Gender Biascited by 82
- 2018Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 72
- 2019What's in a Name? Reducing Bias in Bios without Access to Protected Attributescited by 51
- 2019What does it mean to solve the problem of discrimination in hiring? Social, technical and legal perspectives from the UK on automated hiring systemscited by 38
- 2020What's Sex Got To Do With Fair Machine Learning?cited by 37
- 2020Unsupervised Discovery of Implicit Gender Biascited by 34
- 2015It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopediacited by 30
- 2018What are the biases in my word embedding?cited by 30
- 2020Diversity and Inclusion Metrics in Subset Selectioncited by 27
- 2021Measuring Model Biases in the Absence of Ground Truthcited by 24
- 2020Nurse is Closer to Woman than Surgeon? Mitigating Gender-Biased Proximities in Word Embeddingscited by 20
- 2019What You See Is What You Get? The Impact of Representation Criteria on Human Bias in Hiringcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scalecited by 262
- 2023CoMPosT: Characterizing and Evaluating Caricature in LLM Simulationscited by 94
- 2025HumT DumT: Measuring and controlling human-like language in LLMscited by 11
- 2023Mitigating Simplicity Bias in Deep Learning for Improved OOD Generalization and Robustnesscited by 7
- 2022More Data Can Lead Us Astray: Active Data Acquisition in the Presence of Label Biascited by 3
- 2026VEAT Quantifies Implicit Associations in Text-to-Video Generator Sora and Reveals Challenges in Bias Mitigationcited by 2
- 2026VEAT Quantifies Implicit Associations in Text-to-Video Generator Sora and Reveals Challenges in Bias Mitigation2 Jan 2026
- 2025HumT DumT: Measuring and controlling human-like language in LLMs18 Feb 2025
- 2023CoMPosT: Characterizing and Evaluating Caricature in LLM Simulations17 Oct 2023
- 2023Mitigating Simplicity Bias in Deep Learning for Improved OOD Generalization and Robustness9 Oct 2023
- 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scale7 Nov 2022
- 2022More Data Can Lead Us Astray: Active Data Acquisition in the Presence of Label Bias15 Jul 2022