mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Social Norm Bias: Residual Harms of Fairness-Aware Algorithms

arXiv 2108.11056 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many modern machine learning algorithms mitigate bias by enforcing fairness constraints across coarsely-defined groups related to a sensitive attribute like gender or race. However, these algorithms seldom account for within-group heterogeneity and biases that may disproportionately affect some members of a group. In this work, we characterize Social Norm Bias (SNoB), a subtle but consequential type of algorithmic discrimination that may be exhibited by machine learning models, even when these systems achieve group fairness objectives. We study this issue through the lens of gender bias in occupation classification. We quantify SNoB by measuring how an algorithm's predictions are associated with conformity to inferred gender norms. When predicting if an individual belongs to a male-dominated occupation, this framework reveals that "fair" classifiers still favor biographies written in ways that align with inferred masculine norms. We compare SNoB across algorithmic fairness methods and show that it is frequently a residual bias, and post-processing approaches do not mitigate this type of bias at all.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2021.

Builds on

39 of 103 references.

References · 39

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  4. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  5. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  6. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
  7. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  8. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  9. 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 703
  10. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  11. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  12. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
27 more
  1. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  2. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
  3. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 346
  4. 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
  5. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
  6. 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
  7. 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214
  8. 2017Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representationscited by 207
  9. 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 170
  10. 2019Predictive Multiplicity in Classificationcited by 162
  11. 2018Reducing Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 152
  12. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  13. 2019Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 124
  14. 2021Challenges in Automated Debiasing for Toxic Language Detectioncited by 95
  15. 2019Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolutioncited by 84
  16. 2020Unmasking Contextual Stereotypes: Measuring and Mitigating BERT's Gender Biascited by 82
  17. 2018Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 72
  18. 2019What's in a Name? Reducing Bias in Bios without Access to Protected Attributescited by 51
  19. 2019What does it mean to solve the problem of discrimination in hiring? Social, technical and legal perspectives from the UK on automated hiring systemscited by 38
  20. 2020What's Sex Got To Do With Fair Machine Learning?cited by 37
  21. 2020Unsupervised Discovery of Implicit Gender Biascited by 34
  22. 2015It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopediacited by 30
  23. 2018What are the biases in my word embedding?cited by 30
  24. 2020Diversity and Inclusion Metrics in Subset Selectioncited by 27
  25. 2021Measuring Model Biases in the Absence of Ground Truthcited by 24
  26. 2020Nurse is Closer to Woman than Surgeon? Mitigating Gender-Biased Proximities in Word Embeddingscited by 20
  27. 2019What You See Is What You Get? The Impact of Representation Criteria on Human Bias in Hiringcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.