mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Patch Attack Invariance: How Sensitive are Patch Attacks to 3D Pose?

arXiv 2108.07229 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2021cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Perturbation-based attacks, while not physically realizable, have been the main emphasis of adversarial machine learning (ML) research. Patch-based attacks by contrast are physically realizable, yet most work has focused on 2D domain with recent forays into 3D. Characterizing the robustness properties of patch attacks and their invariance to 3D pose is important, yet not fully elucidated, and is the focus of this paper. To this end, several contributions are made here: A) we develop a new metric called mean Attack Success over Transformations (mAST) to evaluate patch attack robustness and invariance; and B), we systematically assess robustness of patch attacks to 3D position and orientation for various conditions; in particular, we conduct a sensitivity analysis which provides important qualitative insights into attack effectiveness as a function of the 3D pose of a patch relative to the camera (rotation, translation) and sets forth some properties for patch attack 3D invariance; and C), we draw novel qualitative conclusions including: 1) we demonstrate that for some 3D transformations, namely rotation and loom, increasing the training distribution support yields an increase in patch success over the full range at test time. 2) We provide new insights into the existence of a fundamental cutoff limit in patch attack effectiveness that depends on the extent of out-of-plane rotation angles. These findings should collectively guide future design of 3D patch attacks and defenses.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2021.

Builds on

24 of 40 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  6. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  7. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  8. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  9. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
  10. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
  11. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
  12. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 517
12 more
  1. 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 310
  2. 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
  3. 2018ShapeShifter: Robust Physical Adversarial Attack on Faster R-CNN Object Detectorcited by 159
  4. 2019Making an Invisibility Cloak: Real World Adversarial Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 155
  5. 2020The Translucent Patch: A Physical and Universal Attack on Object Detectorscited by 62
  6. 2020Physical Adversarial Attack on Vehicle Detector in the Carla Simulatorcited by 38
  7. 2020Object Hider: Adversarial Patch Attack Against Object Detectorscited by 23
  8. 2018Adversarial Examples in Remote Sensingcited by 19
  9. 2020DPAttack: Diffused Patch Attacks against Universal Object Detectioncited by 18
  10. 2018Deep Learning based Retinal OCT Segmentationcited by 16
  11. 2020Addressing Artificial Intelligence Bias in Retinal Disease Diagnosticscited by 4
  12. 2020Jacks of All Trades, Masters Of None: Addressing Distributional Shift and Obtrusiveness via Transparent Patch Attackscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.