mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparison of modern open-source visual SLAM approaches

arXiv 2108.01654 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2021cs.RO cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

SLAM is one of the most fundamental areas of research in robotics and computer vision. State of the art solutions has advanced significantly in terms of accuracy and stability. Unfortunately, not all the approaches are available as open-source solutions and free to use. The results of some of them are difficult to reproduce, and there is a lack of comparison on common datasets. In our work, we make a comparative analysis of state of the art open-source methods. We assess the algorithms based on accuracy, computational performance, robustness, and fault tolerance. Moreover, we present a comparison of datasets as well as an analysis of algorithms from a practical point of view. The findings of the work raise several crucial questions for SLAM researchers.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2021.

Builds on

29 of 79 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015ORB-SLAM: a Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM Systemcited by 983
  2. 2020ORB-SLAM3: An Accurate Open-Source Library for Visual, Visual-Inertial and Multi-Map SLAMcited by 862
  3. 2016ORB-SLAM2: an Open-Source SLAM System for Monocular, Stereo and RGB-D Camerascited by 801
  4. 2016Direct Sparse Odometrycited by 479
  5. 2017VINS-Mono: A Robust and Versatile Monocular Visual-Inertial State Estimatorcited by 418
  6. 2016Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization And Mapping: Towards the Robust-Perception Agecited by 405
  7. 2019Kimera: an Open-Source Library for Real-Time Metric-Semantic Localization and Mappingcited by 181
  8. 2017CNN-SLAM: Real-time dense monocular SLAM with learned depth predictioncited by 152
  9. 2018CodeSLAM - Learning a Compact, Optimisable Representation for Dense Visual SLAMcited by 151
  10. 2016Voxblox: Incremental 3D Euclidean Signed Distance Fields for On-Board MAV Planningcited by 148
  11. 2018DynaSLAM: Tracking, Mapping and Inpainting in Dynamic Scenescited by 130
  12. 2018The TUM VI Benchmark for Evaluating Visual-Inertial Odometrycited by 94
17 more
  1. 2018DS-SLAM: A Semantic Visual SLAM towards Dynamic Environmentscited by 90
  2. 2019OpenVSLAM: A Versatile Visual SLAM Frameworkcited by 64
  3. 2018LDSO: Direct Sparse Odometry with Loop Closurecited by 50
  4. 2019Visual-Inertial Mapping with Non-Linear Factor Recoverycited by 48
  5. 2017Co-Fusion: Real-time Segmentation, Tracking and Fusion of Multiple Objectscited by 47
  6. 2019A General Optimization-based Framework for Global Pose Estimation with Multiple Sensorscited by 41
  7. 2019Are We Ready for Service Robots? The OpenLORIS-Scene Datasets for Lifelong SLAMcited by 39
  8. 2020A Survey on Deep Learning for Localization and Mapping: Towards the Age of Spatial Machine Intelligencecited by 35
  9. 2017maplab: An Open Framework for Research in Visual-inertial Mapping and Localizationcited by 23
  10. 2019Robust Dense Mapping for Large-Scale Dynamic Environmentscited by 21
  11. 2019Rolling-Shutter Modelling for Direct Visual-Inertial Odometrycited by 15
  12. 2019Incremental Visual-Inertial 3D Mesh Generation with Structural Regularitiescited by 11
  13. 2019Visual SLAM: Why Bundle Adjust?cited by 8
  14. 2018Benchmarking and Comparing Popular Visual SLAM Algorithmscited by 4
  15. 2017PIRVS: An Advanced Visual-Inertial SLAM System with Flexible Sensor Fusion and Hardware Co-Designcited by 2
  16. 2019Segway DRIVE Benchmark: Place Recognition and SLAM Data Collected by A Fleet of Delivery Robotscited by 2
  17. 2018Evolution of Visual Odometry Techniquescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.

3 papers.