mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Memorize, Factorize, or be Na"ive: Learning Optimal Feature Interaction Methods for CTR Prediction

arXiv 2108.01265 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2021cs.LG cs.IRcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Click-through rate prediction is one of the core tasks in commercial recommender systems. It aims to predict the probability of a user clicking a particular item given user and item features. As feature interactions bring in non-linearity, they are widely adopted to improve the performance of CTR prediction models. Therefore, effectively modelling feature interactions has attracted much attention in both the research and industry field. The current approaches can generally be categorized into three classes: (1) na"ive methods, which do not model feature interactions and only use original features; (2) memorized methods, which memorize feature interactions by explicitly viewing them as new features and assigning trainable embeddings; (3) factorized methods, which learn latent vectors for original features and implicitly model feature interactions through factorization functions. Studies have shown that modelling feature interactions by one of these methods alone are suboptimal due to the unique characteristics of different feature interactions. To address this issue, we first propose a general framework called OptInter which finds the most suitable modelling method for each feature interaction. Different state-of-the-art deep CTR models can be viewed as instances of OptInter. To realize the functionality of OptInter, we also introduce a learning algorithm that automatically searches for the optimal modelling method. We conduct extensive experiments on four large datasets. Our experiments show that OptInter improves the best performed state-of-the-art baseline deep CTR models by up to 2.21%. Compared to the memorized method, which also outperforms baselines, we reduce up to 91% parameters. In addition, we conduct several ablation studies to investigate the influence of different components of OptInter. Finally, we provide interpretable discussions on the results of OptInter.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2021.

Builds on

25 of 40 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  2. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  3. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
  4. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,489
  5. 2018Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Searchcited by 902
  6. 2016Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 745
  7. 2017DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Predictioncited by 673
  8. 2017Large-Scale Evolution of Image Classifierscited by 348
  9. 2016Designing Neural Network Architectures using Reinforcement Learningcited by 277
  10. 2018Neural Architecture Optimizationcited by 164
  11. 2016Product-based Neural Networks for User Response Predictioncited by 145
  12. 2016Deep Learning over Multi-field Categorical Data: A Case Study on User Response Predictioncited by 67
13 more
  1. 2018Field-weighted Factorization Machines for Click-Through Rate Prediction in Display Advertisingcited by 59
  2. 2020AutoFIS: Automatic Feature Interaction Selection in Factorization Models for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 52
  3. 2020AutoEmb: Automated Embedding Dimensionality Search in Streaming Recommendationscited by 47
  4. 2018Product-based Neural Networks for User Response Prediction over Multi-field Categorical Datacited by 44
  5. 2020An Embedding Learning Framework for Numerical Features in CTR Predictioncited by 37
  6. 2021FM2: Field-matrixed Factorization Machines for Recommender Systemscited by 31
  7. 2021AutoLoss: Automated Loss Function Search in Recommendationscited by 31
  8. 2020Detecting Beneficial Feature Interactions for Recommender Systemscited by 22
  9. 2020Directional Pruning of Deep Neural Networkscited by 16
  10. 2020Memory-efficient Embedding for Recommendationscited by 15
  11. 2021Neural Graph Matching based Collaborative Filteringcited by 9
  12. 2021AutoFT: Automatic Fine-Tune for Parameters Transfer Learning in Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 6
  13. 2021A General Method For Automatic Discovery of Powerful Interactions In Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

12 papers.