More Parameters? No Thanks!
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work studies the long-standing problems of model capacity and negative interference in multilingual neural machine translation MNMT. We use network pruning techniques and observe that pruning 50-70% of the parameters from a trained MNMT model results only in a 0.29-1.98 drop in the BLEU score. Suggesting that there exist large redundancies even in MNMT models. These observations motivate us to use the redundant parameters and counter the interference problem efficiently. We propose a novel adaptation strategy, where we iteratively prune and retrain the redundant parameters of an MNMT to improve bilingual representations while retaining the multilinguality. Negative interference severely affects high resource languages, and our method alleviates it without any additional adapter modules. Hence, we call it parameter-free adaptation strategy, paving way for the efficient adaptation of MNMT. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on a 9 language MNMT trained on TED talks, and report an average improvement of +1.36 BLEU on high resource pairs. Code will be released here.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2021.
Builds on
30 of 36 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
- 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,488
- 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 898
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 856
- 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
18 more
- 2016Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translationcited by 469
- 2020Improving Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation and Zero-Shot Translationcited by 277
- 2019Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation in the Wild: Findings and Challengescited by 257
- 2019Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 246
- 2017Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting by Incremental Moment Matchingcited by 243
- 2019Simple, Scalable Adaptation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 242
- 2016Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translationcited by 188
- 2018When and Why are Pre-trained Word Embeddings Useful for Neural Machine Translation?cited by 126
- 2016Multi-Way, Multilingual Neural Machine Translation with a Shared Attention Mechanismcited by 117
- 2017Encoder Based Lifelong Learningcited by 102
- 2019Multilingual Neural Machine Translation with Knowledge Distillationcited by 95
- 2018Rapid Adaptation of Neural Machine Translation to New Languagescited by 82
- 2020Recipes for Adapting Pre-trained Monolingual and Multilingual Models to Machine Translationcited by 28
- 2020Multilingual Machine Translation: Closing the Gap between Shared and Language-specific Encoder-Decoderscited by 23
- 2018Compact Personalized Models for Neural Machine Translationcited by 19
- 2018Freezing Subnetworks to Analyze Domain Adaptation in Neural Machine Translationcited by 10
- 2020Unsupervised Pretraining for Neural Machine Translation Using Elastic Weight Consolidationcited by 3
- 2020Exploring Pair-Wise NMT for Indian Languagescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.