Online Off-policy Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates the problem of online prediction learning, where learning proceeds continuously as the agent interacts with an environment. The predictions made by the agent are contingent on a particular way of behaving, represented as a value function. However, the behavior used to select actions and generate the behavior data might be different from the one used to define the predictions, and thus the samples are generated off-policy. The ability to learn behavior-contingent predictions online and off-policy has long been advocated as a key capability of predictive-knowledge learning systems but remained an open algorithmic challenge for decades. The issue lies with the temporal difference (TD) learning update at the heart of most prediction algorithms: combining bootstrapping, off-policy sampling and function approximation may cause the value estimate to diverge. A breakthrough came with the development of a new objective function that admitted stochastic gradient descent variants of TD. Since then, many sound online off-policy prediction algorithms have been developed, but there has been limited empirical work investigating the relative merits of all the variants. This paper aims to fill these empirical gaps and provide clarity on the key ideas behind each method. We summarize the large body of literature on off-policy learning, focusing on 1- methods that use computation linear in the number of features and are convergent under off-policy sampling, and 2- other methods which have proven useful with non-fixed, nonlinear function approximation. We provide an empirical study of off-policy prediction methods in two challenging microworlds. We report each method's parameter sensitivity, empirical convergence rate, and final performance, providing new insights that should enable practitioners to successfully extend these new methods to large-scale applications.[Abridged abstract]
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021A Generalized Projected Bellman Error for Off-policy Value Estimation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2021Emphatic Algorithms for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2022Continual Auxiliary Task Learningcited by 9
- 2021Learning Expected Emphatic Traces for Deep RLcited by 5
- 2021Learning robust driving policies without online explorationcited by 2
- 2024When Do Off-Policy and On-Policy Policy Gradient Methods Align?cited by 2
- 2022Importance Sampling Placement in Off-Policy Temporal-Difference Methodscited by 1
- 2022Gradient Descent Temporal Difference-difference Learningcited by 1
- 2021Schedule Based Temporal Difference Algorithmscited by 0
- 2024When Do Off-Policy and On-Policy Policy Gradient Methods Align?19 Feb 2024
- 2022Gradient Descent Temporal Difference-difference Learning10 Sep 2022
- 2022Importance Sampling Placement in Off-Policy Temporal-Difference Methods18 Mar 2022
- 2022Continual Auxiliary Task Learning22 Feb 2022
- 2021Schedule Based Temporal Difference Algorithms23 Nov 2021
- 2021Learning Expected Emphatic Traces for Deep RL12 Jul 2021
- 2021Emphatic Algorithms for Deep Reinforcement Learning21 Jun 2021
- 2021A Generalized Projected Bellman Error for Off-policy Value Estimation in Reinforcement Learning28 Apr 2021
- 2021Learning robust driving policies without online exploration15 Mar 2021