mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

JPGNet: Joint Predictive Filtering and Generative Network for Image Inpainting

arXiv 2107.04281 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2021cs.CVcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image inpainting aims to restore the missing regions of corrupted images and make the recovery result identical to the originally complete image, which is different from the common generative task emphasizing the naturalness or realism of generated images. Nevertheless, existing works usually regard it as a pure generation problem and employ cutting-edge deep generative techniques to address it. The generative networks can fill the main missing parts with realistic contents but usually distort the local structures or introduce obvious artifacts. In this paper, for the first time, we formulate image inpainting as a mix of two problems, predictive filtering and deep generation. Predictive filtering is good at preserving local structures and removing artifacts but falls short to complete the large missing regions. The deep generative network can fill the numerous missing pixels based on the understanding of the whole scene but hardly restores the details identical to the original ones. To make use of their respective advantages, we propose the joint predictive filtering and generative network (JPGNet) that contains three branches: predictive filtering & uncertainty network (PFUNet), deep generative network, and uncertainty-aware fusion network (UAFNet). The PFUNet can adaptively predict pixel-wise kernels for filtering-based inpainting according to the input image and output an uncertainty map. This map indicates the pixels should be processed by filtering or generative networks, which is further fed to the UAFNet for a smart combination between filtering and generative results. Note that, our method as a novel inpainting framework can benefit any existing generation-based methods. We validate our method on three public datasets, Dunhuang, Places2, and CelebA, and demonstrate that our method can enhance three state-of-the-art generative methods significantly with slightly extra time costs.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2021.

Builds on

18 of 44 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  3. 2016Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpaintingcited by 1,424
  4. 2016Conditional Image Generation with PixelCNN Decoderscited by 859
  5. 2018Generative Image Inpainting with Contextual Attentioncited by 578
  6. 2018Image Inpainting for Irregular Holes Using Partial Convolutionscited by 505
  7. 2017PixelCNN++: Improving the PixelCNN with Discretized Logistic Mixture Likelihood and Other Modificationscited by 415
  8. 2016Semantic Image Inpainting with Deep Generative Modelscited by 156
  9. 2017Burst Denoising with Kernel Prediction Networkscited by 156
  10. 2019StructureFlow: Image Inpainting via Structure-aware Appearance Flowcited by 118
  11. 2020Recurrent Feature Reasoning for Image Inpaintingcited by 107
  12. 2021Generating Diverse Structure for Image Inpainting With Hierarchical VQ-VAEcited by 106
6 more
  1. 2019Image inpainting: A reviewcited by 89
  2. 2021Auto-Exposure Fusion for Single-Image Shadow Removalcited by 78
  3. 2020EfficientDeRain: Learning Pixel-wise Dilation Filtering for High-Efficiency Single-Image Derainingcited by 39
  4. 2018Learning to Synthesize Motion Blurcited by 37
  5. 2016Depth Image Inpainting: Improving Low Rank Matrix Completion with Low Gradient Regularizationcited by 11
  6. 2018RankGAN: A Maximum Margin Ranking GAN for Generating Facescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 7; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area: