mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

In-distribution adversarial attacks on object recognition models using gradient-free search

arXiv 2106.16198 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks are susceptible to small perturbations in the form of 2D rotations and shifts, image crops, and even changes in object colors. Past works attribute these errors to dataset bias, claiming that models fail on these perturbed samples as they do not belong to the training data distribution. Here, we challenge this claim and present evidence of the widespread existence of perturbed images within the training data distribution, which networks fail to classify. We train models on data sampled from parametric distributions, then search inside this data distribution to find such in-distribution adversarial examples. This is done using our gradient-free evolution strategies (ES) based approach which we call CMA-Search. Despite training with a large-scale (0.5 million images), unbiased dataset of camera and light variations, CMA-Search can find a failure inside the data distribution in over 71% cases by perturbing the camera position. With lighting changes, CMA-Search finds misclassifications in 42% cases. These findings also extend to natural images from ImageNet and Co3D datasets. This phenomenon of in-distribution images presents a highly worrisome problem for artificial intelligence -- they bypass the need for a malicious agent to add engineered noise to induce an adversarial attack. All code, datasets, and demos are available at https://github.com/Spandan-Madan/in_distribution_adversarial_examples.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2021.

Builds on

32 of 56 references.

References · 32

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  6. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
  7. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  8. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
  9. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  10. 2019Making Convolutional Networks Shift-Invariant Againcited by 390
  11. 2016The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorialcited by 364
  12. 2019SynSin: End-to-end View Synthesis from a Single Imagecited by 364
20 more
  1. 2020Single-View View Synthesis with Multiplane Imagescited by 263
  2. 2018Why do deep convolutional networks generalize so poorly to small image transformations?cited by 198
  3. 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
  4. 2016View Synthesis by Appearance Flowcited by 172
  5. 2018Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalizationcited by 171
  6. 2020Novel View Synthesis of Dynamic Scenes with Globally Coherent Depths from a Monocular Cameracited by 166
  7. 2018Strike (with) a Pose: Neural Networks Are Easily Fooled by Strange Poses of Familiar Objectscited by 143
  8. 2019ColorFool: Semantic Adversarial Colorizationcited by 89
  9. 2016Robustness of classifiers: from adversarial to random noisecited by 87
  10. 2018Semantic Adversarial Examplescited by 86
  11. 2017Exploring the Landscape of Spatial Robustnesscited by 81
  12. 2018Adversarial vulnerability for any classifiercited by 78
  13. 2015Analysis of classifiers' robustness to adversarial perturbationscited by 76
  14. 2019The Odds are Odd: A Statistical Test for Detecting Adversarial Examplescited by 75
  15. 2017Adversarial Attacks Beyond the Image Spacecited by 67
  16. 2019Semantic Adversarial Attacks: Parametric Transformations That Fool Deep Classifierscited by 56
  17. 2020Truly shift-invariant convolutional neural networkscited by 53
  18. 2016Early Methods for Detecting Adversarial Imagescited by 36
  19. 2019Minimal Images in Deep Neural Networks: Fragile Object Recognition in Natural Imagescited by 5
  20. 2019Analyzing and Improving Neural Networks by Generating Semantic Counterexamples through Differentiable Renderingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

3 papers.