mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Draw Me a Flower: Processing and Grounding Abstraction in Natural Language

arXiv 2106.14321 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2021cs.CLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Abstraction is a core tenet of human cognition and communication. When composing natural language instructions, humans naturally evoke abstraction to convey complex procedures in an efficient and concise way. Yet, interpreting and grounding abstraction expressed in NL has not yet been systematically studied in NLP, with no accepted benchmarks specifically eliciting abstraction in NL. In this work, we set the foundation for a systematic study of processing and grounding abstraction in NLP. First, we deliver a novel abstraction elicitation method and present Hexagons, a 2D instruction-following game. Using Hexagons we collected over 4k naturally-occurring visually-grounded instructions rich with diverse types of abstractions. From these data, we derive an instruction-to-execution task and assess different types of neural models. Our results show that contemporary models and modeling practices are substantially inferior to human performance, and that models' performance is inversely correlated with the level of abstraction, showing less satisfying performance on higher levels of abstraction. These findings are consistent across models and setups, confirming that abstraction is a challenging phenomenon deserving further attention and study in NLP/AI research.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2021.

Builds on

20 of 55 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  3. 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,013
  4. 2018BabyAI: A Platform to Study the Sample Efficiency of Grounded Language Learningcited by 238
  5. 2018Touchdown: Natural Language Navigation and Spatial Reasoning in Visual Street Environmentscited by 238
  6. 2018Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation Methodologycited by 133
  7. 2018Mapping Instructions to Actions in 3D Environments with Visual Goal Predictioncited by 101
  8. 2020Span-based Semantic Parsing for Compositional Generalizationcited by 77
  9. 2019Executing Instructions in Situated Collaborative Interactionscited by 68
  10. 2019The PhotoBook Dataset: Building Common Ground through Visually-Grounded Dialoguecited by 46
  11. 2018Large-Scale QA-SRL Parsingcited by 45
  12. 2016Learning Language Games through Interactioncited by 43
8 more
  1. 2019A Natural Language Corpus of Common Grounding under Continuous and Partially-Observable Contextcited by 35
  2. 2019Controlled Crowdsourcing for High-Quality QA-SRL Annotationcited by 34
  3. 2020QADiscourse -- Discourse Relations as QA Pairs: Representation, Crowdsourcing and Baselinescited by 34
  4. 2016Simpler Context-Dependent Logical Forms via Model Projectionscited by 33
  5. 2017Naturalizing a Programming Language via Interactive Learningcited by 20
  6. 2017Learning Interpretable Spatial Operations in a Rich 3D Blocks Worldcited by 15
  7. 2018Planning, Inference and Pragmatics in Sequential Language Gamescited by 12
  8. 2019RUN through the Streets: A New Dataset and Baseline Models for Realistic Urban Navigationcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 5; 2024: 6; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: