mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Canonical Face Embeddings

arXiv 2106.07822 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2021cs.CV cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present evidence that many common convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained for face verification learn functions that are nearly equivalent under rotation. More specifically, we demonstrate that one face verification model's embeddings (i.e. last-layer activations) can be compared directly to another model's embeddings after only a rotation or linear transformation, with little performance penalty. This finding is demonstrated using IJB-C 1:1 verification across the combinations of ten modern off-the-shelf CNN-based face verification models which vary in training dataset, CNN architecture, method of angular loss calculation, or some combination of the 3. These networks achieve a mean true accept rate of 0.96 at a false accept rate of 0.01. When instead evaluating embeddings generated from two CNNs, where one CNN's embeddings are mapped with a linear transformation, the mean true accept rate drops to 0.95 using the same verification paradigm. Restricting these linear maps to only perform rotation produces a mean true accept rate of 0.91. These mappings' existence suggests that a common representation is learned by models despite variation in training or structure. We discuss the broad implications a result like this has, including an example regarding face template security.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2021.

Builds on

34 of 58 references.

References · 34

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  4. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  5. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  6. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  7. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  8. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  9. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  10. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  11. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  12. 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 968
22 more
  1. 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 911
  2. 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 733
  3. 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 631
  4. 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 621
  5. 2014Learning Face Representation from Scratchcited by 451
  6. 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 318
  7. 2018Additive Margin Softmax for Face Verificationcited by 275
  8. 2014Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalencecited by 240
  9. 2017NormFace: L2 Hypersphere Embedding for Face Verificationcited by 237
  10. 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 215
  11. 2019Probabilistic Face Embeddingscited by 171
  12. 2020Partial FC: Training 10 Million Identities on a Single Machinecited by 163
  13. 2019Learning Data Augmentation Strategies for Object Detectioncited by 139
  14. 2016Understanding How Image Quality Affects Deep Neural Networkscited by 118
  15. 2020Robust Learning Through Cross-Task Consistencycited by 105
  16. 2020On Linear Identifiability of Learned Representationscited by 103
  17. 2017On the Reconstruction of Face Images from Deep Face Templatescited by 66
  18. 2018Towards Understanding Learning Representations: To What Extent Do Different Neural Networks Learn the Same Representationcited by 62
  19. 2018On the Intrinsic Dimensionality of Image Representationscited by 57
  20. 2017Deep Heterogeneous Feature Fusion for Template-Based Face Recognitioncited by 6
  21. 2018A Neurobiological Evaluation Metric for Neural Network Model Searchcited by 3
  22. 2020Style Transfer for Light Field Photographycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

3 papers.