mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Synthesizing Adversarial Negative Responses for Robust Response Ranking and Evaluation

arXiv 2106.05894 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2021cs.CLcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Open-domain neural dialogue models have achieved high performance in response ranking and evaluation tasks. These tasks are formulated as a binary classification of responses given in a dialogue context, and models generally learn to make predictions based on context-response content similarity. However, over-reliance on content similarity makes the models less sensitive to the presence of inconsistencies, incorrect time expressions and other factors important for response appropriateness and coherence. We propose approaches for automatically creating adversarial negative training data to help ranking and evaluation models learn features beyond content similarity. We propose mask-and-fill and keyword-guided approaches that generate negative examples for training more robust dialogue systems. These generated adversarial responses have high content similarity with the contexts but are either incoherent, inappropriate or not fluent. Our approaches are fully data-driven and can be easily incorporated in existing models and datasets. Experiments on classification, ranking and evaluation tasks across multiple datasets demonstrate that our approaches outperform strong baselines in providing informative negative examples for training dialogue systems.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2021.

Builds on

53 of 95 references.

References · 53

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  5. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  6. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  7. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  8. 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
  9. 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
  10. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
  11. 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 663
  12. 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 649
38 more
  1. 2020Recipes for building an open-domain chatbotcited by 593
  2. 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 578
  3. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
  4. 2020Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbotcited by 467
  5. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 428
  6. 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
  7. 2016How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generationcited by 356
  8. 2015Skip-Thought Vectorscited by 321
  9. 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 285
  10. 2018Adversarial Example Generation with Syntactically Controlled Paraphrase Networkscited by 282
  11. 2015Building End-To-End Dialogue Systems Using Generative Hierarchical Neural Network Modelscited by 207
  12. 2019TransferTransfo: A Transfer Learning Approach for Neural Network Based Conversational Agentscited by 188
  13. 2020USR: An Unsupervised and Reference Free Evaluation Metric for Dialog Generationcited by 186
  14. 2016A Hierarchical Latent Variable Encoder-Decoder Model for Generating Dialoguescited by 174
  15. 2019Poly-encoders: Transformer Architectures and Pre-training Strategies for Fast and Accurate Multi-sentence Scoringcited by 164
  16. 2019Combating Adversarial Misspellings with Robust Word Recognitioncited by 162
  17. 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 150
  18. 2019Reducing Sentiment Bias in Language Models via Counterfactual Evaluationcited by 148
  19. 2020Can You Put it All Together: Evaluating Conversational Agents' Ability to Blend Skillscited by 130
  20. 2020Enabling Language Models to Fill in the Blankscited by 121
  21. 2020Explaining NLP Models via Minimal Contrastive Editing (MiCE)cited by 105
  22. 2017Towards an Automatic Turing Test: Learning to Evaluate Dialogue Responsescited by 98
  23. 2017RUBER: An Unsupervised Method for Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialog Systemscited by 88
  24. 2020Generate Your Counterfactuals: Towards Controlled Counterfactual Generation for Textcited by 75
  25. 2020Speaker-Aware BERT for Multi-Turn Response Selection in Retrieval-Based Chatbotscited by 73
  26. 2020Robustness to Spurious Correlations via Human Annotationscited by 62
  27. 2020Improving Dialog Evaluation with a Multi-reference Adversarial Dataset and Large Scale Pretrainingcited by 59
  28. 2019Better Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialogue Systems with Contextualized Embeddingscited by 52
  29. 2020Generating Fluent Adversarial Examples for Natural Languagescited by 49
  30. 2019Investigating Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialogue Systems With Human Generated Multiple Referencescited by 48
  31. 2020Adversarial Semantic Collisionscited by 42
  32. 2020Designing Precise and Robust Dialogue Response Evaluatorscited by 37
  33. 2020Probing Linguistic Systematicitycited by 37
  34. 2020Do Response Selection Models Really Know What's Next? Utterance Manipulation Strategies for Multi-turn Response Selectioncited by 36
  35. 2019Towards Coherent and Engaging Spoken Dialog Response Generation Using Automatic Conversation Evaluatorscited by 34
  36. 2020Controlling Dialogue Generation with Semantic Exemplarscited by 25
  37. 2017Analysis of the Impact of Negative Sampling on Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphscited by 22
  38. 2017A Sequential Matching Framework for Multi-turn Response Selection in Retrieval-based Chatbotscited by 9

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 6; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021DialFact: A Benchmark for Fact-Checking in Dialoguecited by 62
  2. 2022Correcting Diverse Factual Errors in Abstractive Summarization via Post-Editing and Language Model Infillingcited by 38
  3. 2023Evaluating the Robustness of Text-to-image Diffusion Models against Real-world Attackscited by 24
  4. 2024Does Negative Sampling Matter? A Review with Insights into its Theory and Applicationscited by 14
  5. 2021MDD-Eval: Self-Training on Augmented Data for Multi-Domain Dialogue Evaluationcited by 13
  6. 2023Understanding the Effectiveness of Very Large Language Models on Dialog Evaluationcited by 12
  7. 2024PairEval: Open-domain Dialogue Evaluation with Pairwise Comparisoncited by 11
  8. 2024SLIDE: A Framework Integrating Small and Large Language Models for Open-Domain Dialogues Evaluationcited by 11
  9. 2022Target-Guided Dialogue Response Generation Using Commonsense and Data Augmentationcited by 8
  10. 2022GraphWOZ: Dialogue Management with Conversational Knowledge Graphscited by 5
  11. 2022A Systematic Evaluation of Response Selection for Open Domain Dialoguecited by 4
  12. 2022Pneg: Prompt-based Negative Response Generation for Dialogue Response Selection Taskcited by 3
4 more
  1. 2022PoE: a Panel of Experts for Generalized Automatic Dialogue Assessmentcited by 3
  2. 2023DEnsity: Open-domain Dialogue Evaluation Metric using Density Estimationcited by 3
  3. 2024Emphasising Structured Information: Integrating Abstract Meaning Representation into LLMs for Enhanced Open-Domain Dialogue Evaluationcited by 2
  4. 2025DRE: An Effective Dual-Refined Method for Integrating Small and Large Language Models in Open-Domain Dialogue Evaluationcited by 1