mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fundamental tradeoffs between memorization and robustness in random features and neural tangent regimes

arXiv 2106.02630 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2021stat.ML cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work studies the (non)robustness of two-layer neural networks in various high-dimensional linearized regimes. We establish fundamental trade-offs between memorization and robustness, as measured by the Sobolev-seminorm of the model w.r.t the data distribution, i.e the square root of the average squared L2-norm of the gradients of the model w.r.t the its input. More precisely, if n is the number of training examples, d is the input dimension, and k is the number of hidden neurons in a two-layer neural network, we prove for a large class of activation functions that, if the model memorizes even a fraction of the training, then its Sobolev-seminorm is lower-bounded by (i) √n in case of infinite-width random features (RF) or neural tangent kernel (NTK) with d gtrsim n; (ii) √n in case of finite-width RF with proportionate scaling of d and k; and (iii) √n/k in case of finite-width NTK with proportionate scaling of d and k. Moreover, all of these lower-bounds are tight: they are attained by the min-norm / least-squares interpolator (when n, d, and k are in the appropriate interpolating regime). All our results hold as soon as data is log-concave isotropic, and there is label-noise, i.e the target variable is not a deterministic function of the data / features. We empirically validate our theoretical results with experiments. Accidentally, these experiments also reveal for the first time, (iv) a multiple-descent phenomenon in the robustness of the min-norm interpolator.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2021.

Builds on

19 of 42 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  2. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  3. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
  4. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
  5. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
  6. 2018Just Interpolate: Kernel "Ridgeless" Regression Can Generalizecited by 190
  7. 2018To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learningcited by 186
  8. 2019On the Inductive Bias of Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 177
  9. 2015On the Equivalence between Kernel Quadrature Rules and Random Feature Expansionscited by 136
  10. 2020Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelcited by 126
  11. 2020The Neural Tangent Kernel in High Dimensions: Triple Descent and a Multi-Scale Theory of Generalizationcited by 101
  12. 2020The Interpolation Phase Transition in Neural Networks: Memorization and Generalization under Lazy Trainingcited by 84
7 more
  1. 2017A Random Matrix Approach to Neural Networkscited by 80
  2. 2018Adversarial examples from computational constraintscited by 79
  3. 2020Triple descent and the two kinds of overfitting: Where & why do they appear?cited by 64
  4. 2020A law of robustness for two-layers neural networkscited by 54
  5. 2020A Brief Prehistory of Double Descentcited by 44
  6. 2019Neural tangent kernels, transportation mappings, and universal approximationcited by 30
  7. 2021A Law of Robustness for Weight-bounded Neural Networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

9 papers.