Robust Linear Regression: Gradient-descent, Early-stopping, and Beyond
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work we study the robustness to adversarial attacks, of early-stopping strategies on gradient-descent (GD) methods for linear regression. More precisely, we show that early-stopped GD is optimally robust (up to an absolute constant) against Euclidean-norm adversarial attacks. However, we show that this strategy can be arbitrarily sub-optimal in the case of general Mahalanobis attacks. This observation is compatible with recent findings in the case of classification~citeVardi2022GradientMP that show that GD provably converges to non-robust models. To alleviate this issue, we propose to apply instead a GD scheme on a transformation of the data adapted to the attack. This data transformation amounts to apply feature-depending learning rates and we show that this modified GD is able to handle any Mahalanobis attack, as well as more general attacks under some conditions. Unfortunately, choosing such adapted transformations can be hard for general attacks. To the rescue, we design a simple and tractable estimator whose adversarial risk is optimal up to within a multiplicative constant of 1.1124 in the population regime, and works for any norm.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2023.
Builds on
20 of 34 references.
References · 20
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
- 2018Rademacher Complexity for Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 132
- 2018Are adversarial examples inevitable?cited by 113
- 2018Adversarial examples from computational constraintscited by 79
- 2020Precise Tradeoffs in Adversarial Training for Linear Regressioncited by 76
- 2018A Continuous-Time View of Early Stopping for Least Squarescited by 67
- 2020The Implicit Regularization of Stochastic Gradient Flow for Least Squarescited by 58
- 2019Lower Bounds on Adversarial Robustness from Optimal Transportcited by 52
- 2020Precise Statistical Analysis of Classification Accuracies for Adversarial Trainingcited by 49
8 more
- 2018The Curse of Concentration in Robust Learning: Evasion and Poisoning Attacks from Concentration of Measurecited by 44
- 2022The curse of overparametrization in adversarial training: Precise analysis of robust generalization for random features regressioncited by 40
- 2020The Curious Case of Adversarially Robust Models: More Data Can Help, Double Descend, or Hurt Generalizationcited by 39
- 2020Provable tradeoffs in adversarially robust classificationcited by 39
- 2022Gradient Methods Provably Converge to Non-Robust Networkscited by 27
- 2020Adversarially Robust Estimate and Risk Analysis in Linear Regressioncited by 22
- 2021Fundamental tradeoffs between memorization and robustness in random features and neural tangent regimescited by 9
- 2021Adversarial robustness for latent models: Revisiting the robust-standard accuracies tradeoffcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023Robust Linear Regression: Phase-Transitions and Precise Tradeoffs for General Normscited by 1
- 2026On damage of interpolation to adversarial robustness in regressioncited by 1
- 2025auto-fpt: Automating Free Probability Theory Calculations for Machine Learning Theorycited by 0
- 2026Information Hidden in Gradients of Regression with Target Noisecited by 0
- 2026Information Hidden in Gradients of Regression with Target Noise26 Jan 2026
- 2026On damage of interpolation to adversarial robustness in regression22 Jan 2026
- 2025auto-fpt: Automating Free Probability Theory Calculations for Machine Learning Theory14 Apr 2025
- 2023Robust Linear Regression: Phase-Transitions and Precise Tradeoffs for General Norms1 Aug 2023