mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Law of Robustness for Weight-bounded Neural Networks

arXiv 2102.08093 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2021stat.ML cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robustness of deep neural networks against adversarial perturbations is a pressing concern motivated by recent findings showing the pervasive nature of such vulnerabilities. One method of characterizing the robustness of a neural network model is through its Lipschitz constant, which forms a robustness certificate. A natural question to ask is, for a fixed model class (such as neural networks) and a dataset of size n, what is the smallest achievable Lipschitz constant among all models that fit the dataset? Recently, (Bubeck et al., 2020) conjectured that when using two-layer networks with k neurons to fit a generic dataset, the smallest Lipschitz constant is Omega(√fracnk). This implies that one would require one neuron per data point to robustly fit the data. In this work we derive a lower bound on the Lipschitz constant for any arbitrary model class with bounded Rademacher complexity. Our result coincides with that conjectured in (Bubeck et al., 2020) for two-layer networks under the assumption of bounded weights. However, due to our result's generality, we also derive bounds for multi-layer neural networks, discovering that one requires log n constant-sized layers to robustly fit the data. Thus, our work establishes a law of robustness for weight bounded neural networks and provides formal evidence on the necessity of over-parametrization in deep learning.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2021.

Builds on

24 of 41 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  5. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  6. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
  7. 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 686
  8. 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 415
  9. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  10. 2015Norm-Based Capacity Control in Neural Networkscited by 299
  11. 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
  12. 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 290
12 more
  1. 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 132
  2. 2020Feature Purification: How Adversarial Training Performs Robust Deep Learningcited by 107
  3. 2018Adversarial examples from computational constraintscited by 80
  4. 2018Small ReLU networks are powerful memorizers: a tight analysis of memorization capacitycited by 78
  5. 2019Data-dependent Sample Complexity of Deep Neural Networks via Lipschitz Augmentationcited by 71
  6. 2019Convergence of Adversarial Training in Overparametrized Neural Networkscited by 58
  7. 2020A law of robustness for two-layers neural networkscited by 55
  8. 2019Lower Bounds on Adversarial Robustness from Optimal Transportcited by 53
  9. 2017On the Discrimination-Generalization Tradeoff in GANscited by 48
  10. 2020Over-parameterized Adversarial Training: An Analysis Overcoming the Curse of Dimensionalitycited by 36
  11. 2020Distributional Robustness with IPMs and links to Regularization and GANscited by 17
  12. 2019Computational Limitations in Robust Classification and Win-Win Resultscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.