mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Did I do that? Blame as a means to identify controlled effects in reinforcement learning

arXiv 2106.00266 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2021cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Identifying controllable aspects of the environment has proven to be an extraordinary intrinsic motivator to reinforcement learning agents. Despite repeatedly achieving State-of-the-Art results, this approach has only been studied as a proxy to a reward-based task and has not yet been evaluated on its own. Current methods are based on action-prediction. Humans, on the other hand, assign blame to their actions to decide what they controlled. This work proposes Controlled Effect Network (CEN), an unsupervised method based on counterfactual measures of blame to identify effects on the environment controlled by the agent. CEN is evaluated in a wide range of environments showing that it can accurately identify controlled effects. Moreover, we demonstrate CEN's capabilities as intrinsic motivator by integrating it in the state-of-the-art exploration method, achieving substantially better performance than action-prediction models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2021.

Builds on

31 of 57 references.

References · 31

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  4. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
  5. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,221
  6. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
  7. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
  8. 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 966
  9. 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
  10. 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 769
  11. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  12. 2019Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurriculacited by 308
19 more
  1. 2020Agent57: Outperforming the Atari Human Benchmarkcited by 300
  2. 2016Variational Intrinsic Controlcited by 262
  3. 2020Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategiescited by 210
  4. 2021Towards Causal Representation Learningcited by 207
  5. 2019Explainable Reinforcement Learning Through a Causal Lenscited by 177
  6. 2019Unsupervised State Representation Learning in Ataricited by 144
  7. 2015Variational Information Maximisation for Intrinsically Motivated Reinforcement Learningcited by 142
  8. 2018Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda: Counterfactually-Guided Policy Searchcited by 81
  9. 2019Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspectivecited by 77
  10. 2019Causal Reasoning from Meta-reinforcement Learningcited by 53
  11. 2019ChainerRL: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Librarycited by 51
  12. 2019Making Efficient Use of Demonstrations to Solve Hard Exploration Problemscited by 45
  13. 2019Causal Induction from Visual Observations for Goal Directed Taskscited by 31
  14. 2020Griddly: A platform for AI research in gamescited by 31
  15. 2019Reinforcement Learning with Competitive Ensembles of Information-Constrained Primitivescited by 30
  16. 2018Contingency-Aware Exploration in Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
  17. 2013Graded Causation and Defaultscited by 13
  18. 2020Disentangling causal effects for hierarchical reinforcement learningcited by 9
  19. 2019Mega-Reward: Achieving Human-Level Play without Extrinsic Rewardscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.