mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Graded Causation and Defaults

arXiv 1309.1226 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2013cs.AIcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work in psychology and experimental philosophy has shown that judgments of actual causation are often influenced by consideration of defaults, typicality, and normality. A number of philosophers and computer scientists have also suggested that an appeal to such factors can help deal with problems facing existing accounts of actual causation. This paper develops a flexible formal framework for incorporating defaults, typicality, and normality into an account of actual causation. The resulting account takes actual causation to be both graded and comparative. We then show how our account would handle a number of standard cases.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2013.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: