mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MACQ: A Holistic View of Model Acquisition Techniques

arXiv 2206.06530 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2022cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For over three decades, the planning community has explored countless methods for data-driven model acquisition. These range in sophistication (e.g., simple set operations to full-blown reformulations), methodology (e.g., logic-based vs. planing-based), and assumptions (e.g., fully vs. partially observable). With no fewer than 43 publications in the space, it can be overwhelming to understand what approach could or should be applied in a new setting. We present a holistic characterization of the action model acquisition space and further introduce a unifying framework for automated action model acquisition. We have re-implemented some of the landmark approaches in the area, and our characterization of all the techniques offers deep insight into the research opportunities that remain; i.e., those settings where no technique is capable of solving.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2022.

Builds on

6 of 29 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020SPECTER: Document-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformerscited by 430
  2. 2021Learning First-Order Representations for Planning from Black-Box States: New Resultscited by 23
  3. 2014Learning Partially Observable Deterministic Action Modelscited by 15
  4. 2019A Case for Backward Compatibility for Human-AI Teamscited by 7
  5. 2019Learning Action Models from Disordered and Noisy Plan Tracescited by 4
  6. 2020MiniConf -- A Virtual Conference Frameworkcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 3.

7 papers.