Separation of Powers in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative training among mutually distrusting parties. Model updates, rather than training data, are concentrated and fused in a central aggregation server. A key security challenge in FL is that an untrustworthy or compromised aggregation process might lead to unforeseeable information leakage. This challenge is especially acute due to recently demonstrated attacks that have reconstructed large fractions of training data from ostensibly "sanitized" model updates. In this paper, we introduce TRUDA, a new cross-silo FL system, employing a trustworthy and decentralized aggregation architecture to break down information concentration with regard to a single aggregator. Based on the unique computational properties of model-fusion algorithms, all exchanged model updates in TRUDA are disassembled at the parameter-granularity and re-stitched to random partitions designated for multiple TEE-protected aggregators. Thus, each aggregator only has a fragmentary and shuffled view of model updates and is oblivious to the model architecture. Our new security mechanisms can fundamentally mitigate training reconstruction attacks, while still preserving the final accuracy of trained models and keeping performance overheads low.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2021.
Builds on
33 of 63 references.
References · 33
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 832
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 459
- 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 382
- 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
- 2019Decentralized Stochastic Optimization and Gossip Algorithms with Compressed Communicationcited by 221
21 more
- 2015Evaluation of Deep Convolutional Nets for Document Image Classification and Retrievalcited by 213
- 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 210
- 2017Private federated learning on vertically partitioned data via entity resolution and additively homomorphic encryptioncited by 176
- 2018Protection Against Reconstruction and Its Applications in Private Federated Learningcited by 130
- 2018Slalom: Fast, Verifiable and Private Execution of Neural Networks in Trusted Hardwarecited by 102
- 2021PPFL: Privacy-preserving Federated Learning with Trusted Execution Environmentscited by 93
- 2019Peer-to-peer Federated Learning on Graphscited by 85
- 2016Decentralized Collaborative Learning of Personalized Models over Networkscited by 76
- 2020IBM Federated Learning: an Enterprise Framework White Paper V0.1cited by 57
- 2017Personalized and Private Peer-to-Peer Machine Learningcited by 54
- 2017Prochlo: Strong Privacy for Analytics in the Crowdcited by 51
- 2018Chiron: Privacy-preserving Machine Learning as a Servicecited by 40
- 2019Helen: Maliciously Secure Coopetitive Learning for Linear Modelscited by 21
- 2018Efficient Deep Learning on Multi-Source Private Datacited by 17
- 2020MYSTIKO : : Cloud-Mediated, Private, Federated Gradient Descentcited by 6
- 2018Reaching Data Confidentiality and Model Accountability on the CalTraincited by 3
- 2019Insecure Until Proven Updated: Analyzing AMD SEV's Remote Attestationcited by 3
- 2020CacheOut: Leaking Data on Intel CPUs via Cache Evictionscited by 3
- 2020Senate: A Maliciously-Secure MPC Platform for Collaborative Analyticscited by 3
- 2020SEVurity: No Security Without Integrity -- Breaking Integrity-Free Memory Encryption with Minimal Assumptionscited by 2
- 2020CROSSLINE: Breaking "Security-by-Crash" based Memory Isolation in AMD SEVcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
8 papers.
- 2021Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Methods, Challenges and Directionscited by 58
- 2022Gradient Obfuscation Gives a False Sense of Security in Federated Learningcited by 39
- 2023A Survey of Trustworthy Federated Learning with Perspectives on Security, Robustness, and Privacycited by 24
- 2021Neural Tangent Kernel Empowered Federated Learningcited by 15
- 2024Noiseless Privacy-Preserving Decentralized Learningcited by 9
- 2022OLIVE: Oblivious Federated Learning on Trusted Execution Environment against the risk of sparsificationcited by 4
- 2025TAPFed: Threshold Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 4
- 2025Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning from Partial Decryption Verifiable Threshold Multi-Client Functional Encryptioncited by 0
- 2025Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning from Partial Decryption Verifiable Threshold Multi-Client Functional Encryption17 Nov 2025
- 2025TAPFed: Threshold Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning9 Jan 2025
- 2024Noiseless Privacy-Preserving Decentralized Learning15 Apr 2024
- 2023A Survey of Trustworthy Federated Learning with Perspectives on Security, Robustness, and Privacy21 Feb 2023
- 2022Gradient Obfuscation Gives a False Sense of Security in Federated Learning8 Jun 2022
- 2022OLIVE: Oblivious Federated Learning on Trusted Execution Environment against the risk of sparsification15 Feb 2022
- 2021Neural Tangent Kernel Empowered Federated Learning7 Oct 2021
- 2021Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Methods, Challenges and Directions10 Aug 2021