mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The DEVIL is in the Details: A Diagnostic Evaluation Benchmark for Video Inpainting

arXiv 2105.05332 ↗First posted 11 May 2021cs.CVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantitative evaluation has increased dramatically among recent video inpainting work, but the video and mask content used to gauge performance has received relatively little attention. Although attributes such as camera and background scene motion inherently change the difficulty of the task and affect methods differently, existing evaluation schemes fail to control for them, thereby providing minimal insight into inpainting failure modes. To address this gap, we propose the Diagnostic Evaluation of Video Inpainting on Landscapes (DEVIL) benchmark, which consists of two contributions: (i) a novel dataset of videos and masks labeled according to several key inpainting failure modes, and (ii) an evaluation scheme that samples slices of the dataset characterized by a fixed content attribute, and scores performance on each slice according to reconstruction, realism, and temporal consistency quality. By revealing systematic changes in performance induced by particular characteristics of the input content, our challenging benchmark enables more insightful analysis into video inpainting methods and serves as an invaluable diagnostic tool for the field. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/MichiganCOG/devil .

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2021.

Builds on

20 of 37 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  4. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  5. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  6. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  7. 2018YouTube-VOS: Sequence-to-Sequence Video Object Segmentationcited by 228
  8. 2020Learning Joint Spatial-Temporal Transformations for Video Inpaintingcited by 162
  9. 2018FaceForensics: A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Facescited by 118
  10. 2019Deep Flow-Guided Video Inpaintingcited by 116
  11. 2019Deep Video Inpaintingcited by 107
  12. 2020Flow-edge Guided Video Completioncited by 104
8 more
  1. 2019Free-form Video Inpainting with 3D Gated Convolution and Temporal PatchGANcited by 85
  2. 2018Video Inpainting by Jointly Learning Temporal Structure and Spatial Detailscited by 57
  3. 2019Copy-and-Paste Networks for Deep Video Inpaintingcited by 57
  4. 2019Onion-Peel Networks for Deep Video Completioncited by 46
  5. 2015Video Inpainting of Complex Scenescited by 41
  6. 2019An Internal Learning Approach to Video Inpaintingcited by 33
  7. 2017Characterizing and Improving Stability in Neural Style Transfercited by 31
  8. 2019Learnable Gated Temporal Shift Module for Deep Video Inpaintingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

11 papers.