DynamicEval: Rethinking Evaluation for Dynamic Text-to-Video Synthesis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing text-to-video (T2V) evaluation benchmarks, such as VBench and EvalCrafter, suffer from two limitations. (i) While the emphasis is on subject-centric prompts or static camera scenes, camera motion essential for producing cinematic shots and existing metrics under dynamic motion are largely unexplored. (ii) These benchmarks typically aggregate video-level scores into a single model-level score for ranking generative models. Such aggregation, however, overlook video-level evaluation, which is vital to selecting the better video among the candidate videos generated for a given prompt. To address these gaps, we introduce DynamicEval, a benchmark consisting of systematically curated prompts emphasizing dynamic camera motion, paired with 45k human annotations on video pairs from 3k videos generated by ten T2V models. DynamicEval evaluates two key dimensions of video quality: background scene consistency and foreground object consistency. For background scene consistency, we obtain the interpretable error maps based on the Vbench motion smoothness metric. We observe that while the Vbench motion smoothness metric shows promising alignment with human judgments, it fails in two cases: occlusions/disocclusions arising from camera and foreground object movements. Building on this, we propose a new background consistency metric that leverages object error maps to correct two failure cases in a principled manner. Our second innovation is the introduction of a foreground consistency metric that tracks points and their neighbors within each object instance to assess object fidelity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed metrics achieve stronger correlations with human preferences at both the video level and the model level (an improvement of more than 2% points), establishing DynamicEval as a more comprehensive benchmark for evaluating T2V models under dynamic camera motion.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.
Builds on
37 of 48 references.
References · 37
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 5,931
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
- 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,784
- 2025Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Modelscited by 2,536
- 2023Stable Video Diffusion: Scaling Latent Video Diffusion Models to Large Datasetscited by 2,526
- 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,385
- 2024CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformercited by 2,198
- 2023VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 1,755
25 more
- 2024HunyuanVideo: A Systematic Framework For Large Video Generative Modelscited by 1,597
- 2023DUSt3R: Geometric 3D Vision Made Easycited by 1,526
- 2021Frozen in Time: A Joint Video and Image Encoder for End-to-End Retrievalcited by 1,175
- 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,058
- 2024WorldSimBench: Towards Video Generation Models as World Simulatorscited by 867
- 2024Open-Sora: Democratizing Efficient Video Production for Allcited by 637
- 2024Movie Gen: A Cast of Media Foundation Modelscited by 614
- 2024LTX-Video: Realtime Video Latent Diffusioncited by 549
- 2023VideoCrafter1: Open Diffusion Models for High-Quality Video Generationcited by 530
- 2023CoTracker: It is Better to Track Togethercited by 516
- 2023DynamiCrafter: Animating Open-domain Images with Video Diffusion Priorscited by 463
- 2024Lumiere: A Space-Time Diffusion Model for Video Generationcited by 450
- 2023EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Modelscited by 332
- 2022Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectivescited by 314
- 2019A Short Note on the Kinetics-700 Human Action Datasetcited by 308
- 2023Photorealistic Video Generation with Diffusion Modelscited by 304
- 2024Open-Sora Plan: Open-Source Large Video Generation Modelcited by 286
- 2022Selective Annotation Makes Language Models Better Few-Shot Learnerscited by 242
- 2023Holistic Evaluation of Text-To-Image Modelscited by 160
- 2018Large-Scale Study of Perceptual Video Qualitycited by 127
- 2023HRS-Bench: Holistic, Reliable and Scalable Benchmark for Text-to-Image Modelscited by 94
- 2025MEt3R: Measuring Multi-View Consistency in Generated Imagescited by 91
- 2024GenAI Arena: An Open Evaluation Platform for Generative Modelscited by 81
- 2022ComCLIP: Training-Free Compositional Image and Text Matchingcited by 26
- 2021The DEVIL is in the Details: A Diagnostic Evaluation Benchmark for Video Inpaintingcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.