mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural Quality Estimation with Multiple Hypotheses for Grammatical Error Correction

arXiv 2105.04443 ↗First posted 10 May 2021cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) aims to correct writing errors and help language learners improve their writing skills. However, existing GEC models tend to produce spurious corrections or fail to detect lots of errors. The quality estimation model is necessary to ensure learners get accurate GEC results and avoid misleading from poorly corrected sentences. Well-trained GEC models can generate several high-quality hypotheses through decoding, such as beam search, which provide valuable GEC evidence and can be used to evaluate GEC quality. However, existing models neglect the possible GEC evidence from different hypotheses. This paper presents the Neural Verification Network (VERNet) for GEC quality estimation with multiple hypotheses. VERNet establishes interactions among hypotheses with a reasoning graph and conducts two kinds of attention mechanisms to propagate GEC evidence to verify the quality of generated hypotheses. Our experiments on four GEC datasets show that VERNet achieves state-of-the-art grammatical error detection performance, achieves the best quality estimation results, and significantly improves GEC performance by reranking hypotheses. All data and source codes are available at https://github.com/thunlp/VERNet.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2021.

Builds on

24 of 45 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  5. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  6. 2020GECToR -- Grammatical Error Correction: Tag, Not Rewritecited by 177
  7. 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
  8. 2019Encode, Tag, Realize: High-Precision Text Editingcited by 99
  9. 2017JFLEG: A Fluency Corpus and Benchmark for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 96
  10. 2019Parallel Iterative Edit Models for Local Sequence Transductioncited by 81
  11. 2020Encoder-Decoder Models Can Benefit from Pre-trained Masked Language Models in Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 59
  12. 2018Approaching Neural Grammatical Error Correction as a Low-Resource Machine Translation Taskcited by 56
12 more
  1. 2019An Empirical Study of Incorporating Pseudo Data into Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 55
  2. 2019Corpora Generation for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 53
  3. 2019Improving Grammatical Error Correction via Pre-Training a Copy-Augmented Architecture with Unlabeled Datacited by 50
  4. 2018A Multilayer Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Neural Network for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 36
  5. 2019Improving Back-Translation with Uncertainty-based Confidence Estimationcited by 34
  6. 2016Attention-over-Attention Neural Networks for Reading Comprehensioncited by 31
  7. 2019GitHub Typo Corpus: A Large-Scale Multilingual Dataset of Misspellings and Grammatical Errorscited by 22
  8. 2017Semi-supervised Multitask Learning for Sequence Labelingcited by 20
  9. 2019Denoising based Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Text Generationcited by 15
  10. 2018Jointly Learning to Label Sentences and Tokenscited by 9
  11. 2019Multi-Head Multi-Layer Attention to Deep Language Representations for Grammatical Error Detectioncited by 7
  12. 2016Exploiting N-Best Hypotheses to Improve an SMT Approach to Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 4.

11 papers.