mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Uniform Convergence, Adversarial Spheres and a Simple Remedy

arXiv 2105.03491 ↗First posted 7 May 2021cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Previous work has cast doubt on the general framework of uniform convergence and its ability to explain generalization in neural networks. By considering a specific dataset, it was observed that a neural network completely misclassifies a projection of the training data (adversarial set), rendering any existing generalization bound based on uniform convergence vacuous. We provide an extensive theoretical investigation of the previously studied data setting through the lens of infinitely-wide models. We prove that the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) also suffers from the same phenomenon and we uncover its origin. We highlight the important role of the output bias and show theoretically as well as empirically how a sensible choice completely mitigates the problem. We identify sharp phase transitions in the accuracy on the adversarial set and study its dependency on the training sample size. As a result, we are able to characterize critical sample sizes beyond which the effect disappears. Moreover, we study decompositions of a neural network into a clean and noisy part by considering its canonical decomposition into its different eigenfunctions and show empirically that for too small bias the adversarial phenomenon still persists.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2021.

Builds on

23 of 28 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  3. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
  4. 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
  5. 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 617
  6. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
  7. 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
  8. 2017A PAC-Bayesian Approach to Spectrally-Normalized Margin Bounds for Neural Networkscited by 309
  9. 2018Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approachcited by 306
  10. 2017Nearly-tight VC-dimension and pseudodimension bounds for piecewise linear neural networkscited by 304
  11. 2015Norm-Based Capacity Control in Neural Networkscited by 299
  12. 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 223
11 more
  1. 2018To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learningcited by 186
  2. 2019On the Inductive Bias of Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 177
  3. 2019Graph Neural Tangent Kernel: Fusing Graph Neural Networks with Graph Kernelscited by 160
  4. 2020Frequency Bias in Neural Networks for Input of Non-Uniform Densitycited by 140
  5. 2019The Convergence Rate of Neural Networks for Learned Functions of Different Frequenciescited by 134
  6. 2018Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: A PAC-Bayesian Compression Approachcited by 125
  7. 2020On the Similarity between the Laplace and Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 76
  8. 2020Why Do Deep Residual Networks Generalize Better than Deep Feedforward Networks? -- A Neural Tangent Kernel Perspectivecited by 60
  9. 2019Deterministic PAC-Bayesian generalization bounds for deep networks via generalizing noise-resiliencecited by 51
  10. 2019In Defense of Uniform Convergence: Generalization via derandomization with an application to interpolating predictorscited by 44
  11. 2020Label-Aware Neural Tangent Kernel: Toward Better Generalization and Local Elasticitycited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

8 papers.